72 Terrorists Came from Countries Covered by Trump Vetting Order

A review of information compiled by a Senate committee in 2016 reveals that 72 nonwhite invaders from the seven countries covered in President Donald Trump’s vetting executive order have been convicted in terror cases inside the U.S. since the 9/11 attacks, a new report from the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) has shown.

The CIS report, based on a review of information compiled by a Senate committee in 2016, contains facts that “stand in stark contrast to the assertions by the Ninth Circuit judges who have blocked the president’s order on the basis that there is no evidence showing a risk to the United States in allowing aliens from these seven terror-associated countries to come in.”

According to the report, in June 2016 the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest released a report on individuals convicted in terror cases since 9/11.

Using open sources (because the Obama administration refused to provide government records), the report found that 380 out of 580 people convicted in terror cases since 9/11 were foreign-born. The report is no longer available on the Senate website, but a summary published by Fox News is available here, the CIS report continued.

The Center has obtained a copy of the information compiled by the subcommittee. The information compiled includes names of offenders, dates of conviction, terror group affiliation, federal criminal charges, sentence imposed, state of residence, and immigration history.

The Center has extracted information on 72 individuals named in the Senate report whose country of origin is one of the seven terror-associated countries included in the vetting executive order: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen.

The Senate researchers were not able to obtain complete information on each convicted terrorist, so it is possible that more of the convicted terrorists are from these countries.

The United States has admitted terrorists from all of the seven dangerous countries: Somalia—20, Yemen—19, Iraq—19, Syria—7, Iran—4, Libya—2, and Sudan—1, making up a total of 72.

According to the report, at least 17 individuals entered as refugees from these terror-prone countries. Three came in on student visas and one arrived on a diplomatic visa.

At least 25 of these immigrants eventually became citizens. Ten were lawful permanent residents and four were illegal aliens.

These immigrant terrorists lived in at least 16 different states, with the largest number from the terror-associated countries living in New York (10), Minnesota (8), California (8), and Michigan (6). Ironically, Minnesota was one of the states suing to block Trump’s order to pause entries from the terror-associated countries, claiming it harmed the state. At least two of the terrorists were living in Washington, which joined with Minnesota in the lawsuit to block the order.

Thirty-three of the 72 individuals from the seven terror-associated countries were convicted of very serious terror-related crimes, and were sentenced to at least three years’ imprisonment.

The crimes included use of a weapon of mass destruction, conspiracy to commit a terror act, material support of a terrorist or terror group, international money laundering conspiracy, possession of explosives or missiles, and unlawful possession of a machine gun.

Some opponents of the travel suspension have tried to claim that the Senate report was flawed because it included individuals who were not necessarily terrorists because they were convicted of crimes such as identity fraud and false statements, the CIS report continued.

About a dozen individuals in the group from the seven terror-associated countries are in this category. Some are individuals who were arrested and convicted in the months following 9/11 for involvement in a fraudulent hazardous materials and commercial driver’s license scheme that was extremely worrisome to law enforcement and counterterrorism agencies, although a direct link to the 9/11 plot was never claimed.

The information in this report was compiled by Senate staff from open sources, and certainly could have been found by the judges if they or their clerks had looked for it.

Another example that should have come to mind is that of Abdul Razak Ali Artan, who attacked and wounded 11 people on the campus of Ohio State University in November 2016. Artan was a Somalian who arrived in 2007 as a refugee.

President Trump’s vetting order is clearly legal under the provisions of section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which says that the president can suspend the entry of any alien or group of aliens if he finds it to be detrimental to the national interest, the CIS report added.

“He should not have to provide any more justification than was already presented in the order, but if judges demand more reasons, here are 72,” the report concluded.

Although the CIS report did not mention the 9/11 attackers—because they did not come from one of the countries on Trump’s list, they might very well have done so.

Most of the 9/11 hijackers entered the U.S. from Saudi Arabia on a program called “Visa Express” which expedited entrance visas sent in by private Saudi travel agents.

They were literally welcomed into America and were completely free to go about their business, even though many were former militants who had combat experience in Bosnia, Yemen, and Afghanistan.

Incredibly, five of the 19 hijackers violated federal immigration laws while they were in the United States and were staying in the U.S. illegally.

In the months before the attack, four of the five were stopped by U.S. police for speeding. All four could have been arrested—but liberal “civil rights” laws prevented police from even inquiring as to their immigration status.

Recommended For You


  1. What baffles me is the fact that most of the 9/11 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia if one believes the official story. This has obviously by far been the worst terror attack on American soil yet. But why not add Saudi Arabia to this list? Is it because of oil and the corrupt dealings with the Saudi Arabian royal family?

    1. Your last sentence is correct – trade, especially in anything connected to military weapons and planes comes before common sense or even the wishes of the people of the country. Saudi Arabia is a massive customer of all things military, and if the Western world stopped trading with them because of ethical reasons, Russia and China would be in there faster than sending a text.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.