89% of “Refugees” in Holland Still on Welfare Three Years Later

Liberal claims that “refugees” and “immigration” would boost the European economy have been exposed as lies yet again with the nest that 89 percent of all those granted “refugee” status in the Netherlands are still existing on welfare handouts more than two years after invading that country.

According to a report on the Dutch public broadcaster Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (NOS), only 11 percent of “asylum seekers” who received a residence permit in 2014 had managed to find a job within the first two-and-a-half years they were in the country.

Quoting statistics from the state’s Statistics Netherlands (CBS), the report added that those “asylum seekers” who had found work were mainly employed in as waiters, or in “temporary employment.”

CBS Netherlands carried out the survey on behalf of the Ministries of Social Affairs and Employment, Justice and Security, Education, Culture and Science and Health, Welfare and Sport, as they wanted to “know what happens to asylum seekers who arrived in the Netherlands from 2014 onwards,” the report continued.

Only 29 percent of Afghans found work, most often through contacts with other Afghanis who have been settling in the Netherlands since the 1980s.

Afghans however make up the minority of the new fake refugee invasion force. In 2014, 10,000 of the 20,000 “asylum seekers” claimed to come from Syria, while 4,000 claimed to come from Eritrea.

After having obtained a residence permit, the invaders must pass a “civic integration examination” within three years, but as of October 1, 2016, only 6 percent had succeeded in this task.

Only 5.8 percent of the Eritreans have found work, and 10.5 percent of the Syrians.

According to official figures, a single “refugee” in Amsterdam is paid €924.06 per month in welfare, plus housing, and medical cover. A “family” gets a basic allowance of €1,320.09 per month, plus €197.67 per month for each child under the age of 5, and €240.03, for each child aged 6 to 11, and €282.39 for each child aged 11 to 17.

In addition, refugees also qualify for Bijzondere Bijstand (“Special Benefits”) to pay for “essential living expenses” such as washing machines, refrigerators, or to “attend sport clubs.”

In other words, an average family of five “refugees” costs the Dutch taxpayer at least €2000 per month—and likely more.

Given that nearly 90 percent of “refugees” have been drawing this amount out for more than two years, the net drain on the Dutch economy must be in the billions by now—all of which proves once again that the Third World invasion does not “benefit” the economy of European nations, but actually contributes significantly to its destruction.

Recommended For You


  1. Whilst this about Holland, this financial nightmare exists in a few other countries as well. As a former accounts orientated person, I find it staggering that across the Western World, governments have allowed this massive waste of taxpayers money to exist. If they’d all come for work and had accepted jobs for which they may have been capable of doing (bearing in mind their low educational ability), then at least it would have been tolerated. However, as all politicians seem to spend money they do not have, never will have either without BORROWING, there will come a time when countries will become bankrupt. The total amount of Benefits being paid to all these people across the European countries will be astronomical BUT the public will never know as that could cause riots and many of those will be using some form of weapons. What a legacy to leave to the next two/three generations to pick up.

    1. Agree, B. Australia is now impoverished and in debt, despite the hoopla and sports medals and traitor pollies crowing about the glory of multi culti , here. Its a LIE. The loss , dispossession and suffering of ordinary ppl is staggering. For the first time in 200 yrs, ordinary aussies cannot buy a home as cashed up as I ans swarm to gobble the real estate market. Homeless ness is soaring. Rental stress is epidemic. The Oz govt gives any aggressive cashed up foreign govt whatever they want – ONE million hectare rural properties ? not a problem. Properties , with a dam the size of Sydney Harbour ? Not a problem. (Cubbie Station ) A power station nearby ? (Liddle coal fired station, NSW. ) Not a problem. And there you have a new chi com military base right in the centre of Oz. Unbelievable. Bring back treason laws.

  2. “What a legacy to leave to the next two/three generations to pick up”

    Who cares about them? Politicians have elections in a couple of years, that’s what counts!

    Politicians have three priorities:
    1) Getting elected
    2) Getting re-elected
    3) & at distant third…Solving the problems of the country.

    All attempts at “immigration control” is just optics.

Leave a Reply to jo buchanan Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.