The vote by the British Parliament to give the go-ahead to start the “Brexit” process remains meaningless to the UK’s future—because the real threat to Britain’s future existence as a First World nation does not come from Europe, but from Third World immigration, which is being orchestrated by the Westminster Parliament itself.
Leaving the European Union is, therefore, merely rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, as only a radical upheaval in internal British politics can prevent the U.K. from being extinguished by the Third World.
The projection that Britain will become majority nonwhite is not some flight of fancy or delusional rant.
Professor David Coleman, Supernumerary Fellow in Human Sciences and University Professor in Demography at St. John’s College, Oxford, produced a study in 2013 which showed that the aftereffects of “decades of migration” and natural reproduction rates will have made the UK the West’s “most ethnically diverse nation after 2050.”
Furthermore, Professor Coleman said, white Britons will be an outright minority in the UK by the year 2066.
He wrote: “On current trends European populations will become more ethnically diverse, with the possibility that today’s majority ethnic groups will no longer comprise a numerical majority.”
Professor Coleman said migration has become the “primary driver of demographic change.”
According to the data—extracted from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) Census—as of 2011, around 20 percent of people in the UK are “nonwhite or non-British.”
This percentage, the report said, expected to rise to a quarter by 2025, a third by 2040, and reach up to 38 percent by 2050.
Declining birth rates among white Britons is another factor, he said. In England and Wales, 25 percent of births were already to foreign-born mothers.
White Minority in UK by 2066
The report concluded that “the crossover for the whole country when the combined population of all ethnic minority groups together would exceed the population of white British will occur at around 2066.”
Professor Coleman’s figures are from 2012, it should be remembered. By 2016, the situation is much worse.
The report showed that of the 3,289 children born at Ealing Hospital, from February 2010 to February 2011, some 2,655 were to “foreign nationals.”
These foreign nationals included mothers from 104 different countries, including India (537 babies), Sri Lanka (270), Somalia (260), Afghanistan (200), and Pakistan (208).
There were only 634 babies born to “British mothers” at Ealing hospital—although not even that figure determined if these “British” mothers were second of third generation Third World immigrants, a highly possible fact given that whites are already an outright minority in London.
In fact, the only thing that can be said with any certainty is that the 389 Polish mothers who gave birth at Ealing hospital during that time, would have been white.
London Already Majority Third World
The trends are obvious for anyone wishing to see them. According to the 2011 ONS Census, 45 percent of Londoners described themselves as “white British”—a drop from the 58 percent who did so just ten years earlier.
If that was not enough, the next generation of Londoners—that is, those currently in school—should tell anyone who wants to know, what that city will look like in another ten years.
According to 2012 figures released by the UK’s Department for Education (DFE), some 69 percent of all school children in Greater London are nonwhite.
The DFE figures show that for all of London—divided into “inner” and an “outer”” regions for statistical purposes, there were, in 2012, a total of 498,445 pupils at school.
Inner London had 176,920 pupils, of whom 81.3 percent of primary pupils were officially classified as “nonwhite British” by the DFE.
For secondary schools in Inner London, the DFE said that 80.7 percent are “nonwhite British.”
In Outer London, the DFE said, 62.1 percent of primary school children are “nonwhite British,” and 58.7 percent of secondary schoolchildren are “nonwhite British.”
Averaged out, this means that some 67.25 percent of all of London’s schoolchildren are “nonwhite British”—and this would have been in 2012, four years ago.
If London is already 55 percent non-British, the implications of the school-age population entering the adult population will dramatically tip the population balance even more within the next five years.
This has nothing to do with the EU, and everything to do with the immigration policies pursued by successive British governments, for which the people of Britain have continuously voted.
Birmingham Already Majority Third World
Birmingham is Britain’s second largest city—and it is in exactly the same positon as London.
In 2011—that is, five years ago already—a study by Professor Ludi Simpson, Professor of Population Studies at Manchester University, revealed that the city of Birmingham is set to become minority white even if there is no further immigration.
In a report on the declining number of white British schoolchildren in Birmingham, Professor Simpson said that “curbs on immigration will not prevent Birmingham having a white minority population in the future.”
As reported in the Birmingham Mail in 2011, the number of children from “white families is already falling in the Second City, with more than half of under 16s now being from black, Asian, and other ethnic communities.”
“There has been greater diversity of ethnic origins in Britain and Birmingham for each of the past five decades and longer,” he said. “That is unlikely to change.”
“Future immigration is not the reason for this change,” Professor Simpson pointed out—meaning that natural reproduction rates of already existing Third World immigrants was more than enough to swamp the city.
Once again, this is happening completely irrelevant of EU membership.
Birmingham’s school-age population mirrors that of London.
According to a 2013 report issued by the Birmingham Community Safety Partnership (BCSP), just 31 percent of children in that city’s schools were classified as white.
The report also revealed that children spoke a total of 108 languages at home, including Urdu, Punjabi, Bengali, Somali, and others.
Manchester’s Racial Demographic Swing Near
According to the 2011 ONS Census for the city of Manchester, what it called “Ethnic Minority Groups (not White),” accounted for 33.4 percent of the population in that metropolis.
However, that overall figure hides the reality of the age spread of the Third World immigrant population.
According to the “Ethnic groups in Manchester by age and sex (residents) Census 2011” (Table 2, Manchester City Council Public Intelligence Population Publications, report “A17 2011 Ethnic Groups by broad age and sex”), Third World immigrants dominate the under-18 age group.
According to the ONS figures—which, it bears repeating once again, are already five years out of date—in the age group 0–4 years, “Ethnic Minority Groups (not White)” made up 52.4 percent of the total.
In the age group 5–9, “Ethnic Minority Groups (not White)” made up 52 percent of the total.
In the age group 10–15, “Ethnic Minority Groups (not White)” made up 45.6 percent of the total, and in the age group 16–17, they made up 42.6 percent of the total.
The effect of this upon Manchester’s immediate demographic future—that is, within the next five years—is obvious. The city—the third largest in Britain after London and Birmingham—will be majority nonwhite within ten years.
The “Net Immigration” Trick
Professor Coleman’s 2012 report was based on the then current “net rates of immigration,” which had been running at more than 200,000 a year.
The use of the words “net immigration” is, however, an old establishment political party trick to deceive the public about the true extent of Third World immigration into Britain.
The con works this way: they add up the total number of immigrants arriving in Britain, and then deduct from that number the total number of people leaving the country—and the difference is called “net immigration.”
In this way, 200,000 low-IQ sub-Saharan Africans coming into Britain are put on the same level as say, 50,000 white Britons retiring to Spain, or otherwise emigrating—and in this way, they justify the “stabilization” of the UK’s population, as if there has not really been any significant change at all.
The Conservative Party is the prime proponent of this “net migration” confidence trick—which they call “balanced migration.”
Even though the Conservative Party’s election manifesto regularly claims that they will bring “balanced migration levels” to the UK, of course they have never done anything of the sort, and Third World migration into Britain continues to be as high—if not higher—as it was during the Labour Party’s years in power.
Does EU Membership Matter?
The conclusion of this demographic overview is unpalatable to many on the “right” who have campaigned so vigorously for the “no” vote in the June 23 UK referendum.
This conclusion is that membership of the EU is going to make no difference to the only real issue facing Britain: its survival as a First World, majority European, nation.
While there might—or might not, depending on whose statistics one wants to believe—be some economic advantage to leaving the EU—that doesn’t really matter.
EU membership will be irrelevant to the Kingdom of Britainistan in 2060, which will resemble a cross between Nigeria and Saudi Arabia.
The only way that this future can be averted is through a social and political revolution to halt and reverse Third World demographic replacement.
Given current political circumstances in Britain, what are the chances of such a political and social revolution?
The answer to that, unfortunately, is clear.
Will Brexit halt mass Third World immigration? Will Brexit halt the promotion of the “LGBT” mental illness? Will Brexit undo the fundamental flaws of the banking and financial systems? Will Brexit halt the decline of the manufacturing industry? Will Brexit really “save” Britain?
The answer to all of these questions is, of course, no. The reality is that mass Third World immigration—which has destroyed almost all the large inner city areas of the UK, created Islamic no-go zones, and spurred on internal terrorism—are all policies which have been pursued by successive British governments, and not the European Union.
The promotion of the “LGBT” insanity and the wilful destruction of traditional family values through the promotion of homosexual marriage, was started by the “Conservative” Party, independently of the European Union.
The inherent contradictions and often outright fraud of the banking and financial systems—so vividly demonstrated with the multi-billion pound “bailouts” of a few years ago after the “prime mortgage” investment disaster—happened completely outside of the European Union.
The destruction of Britain’s manufacturing industry—and the wholesale exporting of the UK’s industrial processes to China—happened outside of the European Union.
Many other examples of policies which have—and still do—seriously damage Britain can be given. For example, the UK’s “foreign aid” budget—which next year will exceed the local government budget—has nothing to do with the European Union.
The reality is that every single major issue which is leading to the destruction of Britain, is completely independent of, and separate from whatever economic dictates are imposed upon the UK by the European Union.
Even the much-vaunted “EU immigration”—used by the “leave” camp ad infinitum—is, for the greatest part, European in origin. Several hundred thousand Poles can only improve the long-term genetic stock of Britain, not bring it down.
In fact, all of the ills mentioned above—and many more—inflict many nations already outside of the EU. Canada is possibly the best example—a veritable lunatic asylum of political correctness devoted exclusively to destroying every last vestige of Western civilization—and the same thing is happening in the United States of America, to a very large degree.
There is no direct causal link to what many British people seem to perceive as the “ills of the EU” and the European Union as an institution, and it is a seriously mistaken delusion to think that Brexit is going to make all of these problems disappear.
It might be argued that a Brexit could bring about a political realignment within British politics. If that is the case, and a party or policy direction which actually addresses the core issues causing Britain’s decline, results, then Brexit will not have been an exercise in rearranging the deckchairs on the Britannia Titanic.