All News Opinion

Brexit is Irrelevant to Britain’s Future

The June 23 vote on British membership of the European Union is meaningless to the UK’s future—because longstanding immigration policies will have plunged Britain into minority white and Third World status by 2066.

This racial demographic shift will happen no matter what the referendum’s outcome might be—a fact which all of the “vote no” campaigns stoically ignore—and can only be averted by dramatic—and unlikely—internal political reform.

EU-UK

The projection that Britain will become majority nonwhite is not some flight of fancy or delusional rant.

Professor David Coleman, Supernumerary Fellow in Human Sciences and University Professor in Demography at St. John’s College, Oxford, produced a study in 2013 which showed that the aftereffects of “decades of migration” and natural reproduction rates will have made the UK the West’s “most ethnically diverse nation after 2050.”

Express-Coleman-2013

Furthermore, Professor Coleman said, white Britons will be an outright minority in the UK by the year 2066.

His findings were in a report compiled for the Migration Observatory, part of Oxford University’s Centre on Migration Policy and Society (COMPAS).

He wrote: “On current trends European populations will become more ethnically diverse, with the possibility that today’s majority ethnic groups will no longer comprise a numerical majority.”

Professor Coleman said migration has become the “primary driver of demographic change.”

According to the data—extracted from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) Census—as of 2011, around 20 percent of people in the UK are “nonwhite or non-British.”

This percentage, the report said, expected to rise to a quarter by 2025, a third by 2040, and reach up to 38 percent by 2050.

Declining birth rates among white Britons is another factor, he said. In England and Wales, 25 percent of births were already to foreign-born mothers.

White Minority in UK by 2066

The report concluded that “the crossover for the whole country when the combined population of all ethnic minority groups together would exceed the population of white British will occur at around 2066.”

Professor Coleman’s figures are from 2012, it should be remembered. By 2016, the situation is much worse.

For example, in 2011, media reports revealed that at Ealing Hospital, West London, 80 percent of all babies born were to “foreign” mothers.

DM-Ealing

The report showed that of the 3,289 children born at Ealing Hospital, from February 2010 to February 2011, some 2,655 were to “foreign nationals.”

These foreign nationals included mothers from 104 different countries, including India (537 babies), Sri Lanka (270), Somalia (260), Afghanistan (200), and Pakistan (208).

There were only 634 babies born to “British mothers” at Ealing hospital—although not even that figure determined if these “British” mothers were second of third generation Third World immigrants, a highly possible fact given that whites are already an outright minority in London.

In fact, the only thing that can be said with any certainty is that the 389 Polish mothers who gave birth at Ealing hospital during that time, would have been white.

London Already Majority Third World

The trends are obvious for anyone wishing to see them. According to the 2011 ONS Census, 45 percent of Londoners described themselves as “white British”—a drop from the 58 percent who did so just ten years earlier.

BBC-London-45percent-final

If that was not enough, the next generation of Londoners—that is, those currently in school—should tell anyone who wants to know, what that city will look like in another ten years.

According to 2012 figures released by the UK’s Department for Education (DFE), some 69 percent of all school children in Greater London are nonwhite.

The DFE figures show that for all of London—divided into “inner” and an “outer”” regions for statistical purposes, there were, in 2012, a total of 498,445 pupils at school.

Inner London had 176,920 pupils, of whom 81.3 percent of primary pupils were officially classified as “nonwhite British” by the DFE.

For secondary schools in Inner London, the DFE said that 80.7 percent are “nonwhite British.”

In Outer London, the DFE said, 62.1 percent of primary school children are “nonwhite British,” and 58.7 percent of secondary schoolchildren are “nonwhite British.”

Averaged out, this means that some 67.25 percent of all of London’s schoolchildren are “nonwhite British”—and this would have been in 2012, four years ago.

If London is already 55 percent non-British, the implications of the school-age population entering the adult population will dramatically tip the population balance even more within the next five years.

This has nothing to do with the EU, and everything to do with the immigration policies pursued by successive British governments, for which the people of Britain have continuously voted.

Birmingham Already Majority Third World

Birmingham is Britain’s second largest city—and it is in exactly the same positon as London.

In 2011—that is, five years ago already—a study by Professor Ludi Simpson, Professor of Population Studies at Manchester University, revealed that the city of Birmingham is set to become minority white even if there is no further immigration.

Birmingham-Mail-01

In a report on the declining number of white British schoolchildren in Birmingham, Professor Simpson said that “curbs on immigration will not prevent Birmingham having a white minority population in the future.”

As reported in the Birmingham Mail in 2011, the number of children from “white families is already falling in the Second City, with more than half of under 16s now being from black, Asian, and other ethnic communities.”

“There has been greater diversity of ethnic origins in Britain and Birmingham for each of the past five decades and longer,” he said. “That is unlikely to change.”

“Future immigration is not the reason for this change,” Professor Simpson pointed out—meaning that natural reproduction rates of already existing Third World immigrants was more than enough to swamp the city.

Once again, this is happening completely irrelevant of EU membership.

Birmingham’s school-age population mirrors that of London.

According to a 2013 report issued by the Birmingham Community Safety Partnership (BCSP), just 31 percent of children in that city’s schools were classified as white.

The report also revealed that children spoke a total of 108 languages at home, including Urdu, Punjabi, Bengali, Somali, and others.

express-Birmingham-01

Manchester’s Racial Demographic Swing Near

According to the 2011 ONS Census for the city of Manchester, what it called “Ethnic Minority Groups (not White),” accounted for 33.4 percent of the population in that metropolis.

However, that overall figure hides the reality of the age spread of the Third World immigrant population.

According to the “Ethnic groups in Manchester by age and sex (residents) Census 2011” (Table 2, Manchester City Council Public Intelligence Population Publications, report “A17 2011 Ethnic Groups by broad age and sex”), Third World immigrants dominate the under-18 age group.

Ethnic Group by sex by age.xlsx

According to the ONS figures—which, it bears repeating once again, are already five years out of date—in the age group 0–4 years, “Ethnic Minority Groups (not White)” made up 52.4 percent of the total.

In the age group 5–9, “Ethnic Minority Groups (not White)” made up 52 percent of the total.

In the age group 10–15, “Ethnic Minority Groups (not White)” made up 45.6 percent of the total, and in the age group 16–17, they made up 42.6 percent of the total.

The effect of this upon Manchester’s immediate demographic future—that is, within the next five years—is obvious. The city—the third largest in Britain after London and Birmingham—will be majority nonwhite within ten years.

The “Net Immigration” Trick

Professor Coleman’s 2012 report was based on the then current “net rates of immigration,” which had been running at more than 200,000 a year.

The use of the words “net immigration” is, however, an old establishment political party trick to deceive the public about the true extent of Third World immigration into Britain.

The con works this way: they add up the total number of immigrants arriving in Britain, and then deduct from that number the total number of people leaving the country—and the difference is called “net immigration.”

In this way, 200,000 low-IQ sub-Saharan Africans coming into Britain are put on the same level as say, 50,000 white Britons retiring to Spain, or otherwise emigrating—and in this way, they justify the “stabilization” of the UK’s population, as if there has not really been any significant change at all.

The Conservative Party is the prime proponent of this “net migration” confidence trick—which they call “balanced migration.”

Even though the Conservative Party’s election manifesto regularly claims that they will bring “balanced migration levels” to the UK, of course they have never done anything of the sort, and Third World migration into Britain continues to be as high—if not higher—as it was during the Labour Party’s years in power.

UKIP Fails to Address the Real Issue

Even the UK Independence Party (UKIP), which is currently the favored “alternative” party to the Conservative and Labour parties, often touts this “balanced migration” lie.

In its 2015 election manifesto, the party specifically said that “UKIP has no intention of ‘pulling up the drawbridge’ to Britain, as has been suggested. We simply want to control who walks over it, like nearly 200 other countries worldwide.”

UKIPManifesto2015-10

It is clear that not even UKIP dares to address the real issue—namely that there are already so many Third World immigrants and their descendants present in Britain, that even if the drawbridge had to be pulled up,” it would make no difference to the fact that by 2060, white British people are going to be a minority in the UK.

Does EU Membership Matter?

The conclusion of this demographic overview is unpalatable to many on the “right” who have campaigned so vigorously for the “no” vote in the June 23 UK referendum.

This conclusion is that membership of the EU is going to make no difference to the only real issue facing Britain: its survival as a First World, majority European, nation.

While there might—or might not, depending on whose statistics one wants to believe—be some economic advantage to leaving the EU—that doesn’t really matter.

EU membership will be irrelevant to the Kingdom of Britainistan in 2060, which will resemble a cross between Nigeria and Saudi Arabia.

The only way that this future can be averted is through a social and political revolution to halt and reverse Third World demographic replacement.

Given current political circumstances in Britain, what are the chances of such a political and social revolution?

The answer to that, unfortunately, is clear.

Wise people should now be thinking of alternatives.

* This article was written especially for the New Observer by Arthur Kemp, author of March of the Titans, the Complete History of the White Race.

63 Comments

  1. Firstly, close the borders and install the army on them. Stop all immigration. Then what we need, is to reintroduce hanging for treason. That would soon get rid of at least 1000 of the traitorous, muslim loving b*stards in parliament. Then we could repatriate 5 million over 5yrs, starting with illegals, criminals, all those immigrants on benefits and ALL muslims. That would do for starters. Of course we need a leader with a spine, not a traitorous, anti British, europhile and muslim worshipping PM!

     
    Reply
    1. Couldn`t agree more antieu, albeit with one minor quibble.
      Where the hell would we find a leader with the attributes you specified amongst any of our political parties.
      I guess we can discount George Galloway for a start.

       
      Reply
    2. Antieu,
      If your kids there are like the white kids here in the states they are fat, lazy and indoctrinated in schools they should be ashamed of their white privilege. Seems they only care about video games, facebook and smoking crack. I’m afraid until Caucasians get a wake up call about the reality of this genocide this trend will continue until we’re extinct. There’s times I’m ashamed of the state my race has allowed itself to get into.

       
      Reply
      1. I wouldn’t (I hope) be too despondent about whites. If you think of the competition, blacks are entirely dependent and can’t do anything for themselves. Brown Asians are (roughly) divided into inbred fanatical Muslims, who can’t do anything for themselves, and Hindus who have a long history, but not of acute criticism and action. The far east races, despite aggravations and wars by the ‘west’ haven’t managed much for themselves. The others, mainly Jews who have infiltrated right across the globe, spend all their energies on fraud and lies and deception, and crimes and wars. I’m doing my best to be optimistic here. Let’s not give up. It’s nice to watch Trump describe young Americans as ‘beautiful’. It’s part of the spirit needed. We’re in a situation a bit like during the Black Death…

         
        Reply
        1. but we are leAVING IT TO OUR KIDS…WE SHOULD FIGHT WHILE WE CAN,THEY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO IN THE FUTURE…WE CAUSED IT SO ITS FOR US TO DEAL WITH IT..

           
          Reply
          1. True, though the British since 1914 have almost all refused to discuss the Jewish issue.

             
      2. We need rid of all the liberal lefty sc*m who indoctrinate the children in schools, univerities and elswhere. They should all be deported to S.Africa or some muslim country!

         
        Reply
        1. Karma is a bitch, what your liberal idiotic governments ( supported by the people) did to white South Africans, is coming back to bite you guys in the ass. Keep your liberals, we don’t want them, we’ve got enough problems with the terrorists in power thanks to your governments !!

           
          Reply
          1. Sadly what you say about the lefties and Karma is spot on. As we don’t want the Liberals either my suggestion would be to start hanging them.

             
        2. agree with you completly, since nursery they have been completely brainwashed mind you we all know what happens when a cork is taken out of the bottle once shaken it explodes.

           
          Reply
        3. Totally agree.Its not just the immigrants.Its the left wing fascists that need taking into account too.They are nothing less than traitors and collaberators.They caused this.

           
          Reply
      1. Impossible to live on a normal wage in London. Housing benefits cannot be cut, because the housing shortage has created homelessness. Work hard and be rewarded is not a real option.

         
        Reply
        1. There`s something wholly corrupt about a system that not only allows but even encourages people of colour to mention `asylum`then get housing and benefits just to show how anti-racist we are.
          Our own kith and kin can go get stuffed.
          Immigration has destroyed systems put in place over generations for the indigenous population. They were never designed for the world and his wife to avail themselves and rightly so.
          We can`t blithely operate on suicidal overload for much longer.
          Sitting back as our feckless politicians do is not an option. We can`t cope with these numbers or the costs.
          .

           
          Reply
    3. This is against the traitorous governments NWO plan…we need to get out of eu, get a government for the indiginous people and get rid of the gimmegrants…!!!

       
      Reply
    4. UKIP is very far short of what our country needs. As it moves closer to the possibility of power so the draw of the liberal centre will become irresistible; UKIP’s latest star, Carswell, – already tipped as likely leader after the general election – has made many statements in favour of immigration and has denounced what he calls “angry nativism” , although “angry nativism”, it might have been supposed, is why people vote for UKIP! Farage has said that he wants to recruit skilled engineers from India rather than from continental Europe while Carswell (again) speaks of UKIP being for “first and second generation Brits as much as for those whose ancestors came over before the Norman conquest” – in other words, UKIP too wants to pander to the minorities.

       
      Reply
    5. With the right goverment and I don’t mean Tory, labour,or the libs, but a strong party that will make decisions and not be afraid of world opinion but work for the natural British people ban faith schools, all schools teach Christianity and English as the only taught language, ban inappropriate places of worship, and all who live in this country abide by English law Is there a political party out there to do that??

       
      Reply
  2. With the influx of the Middle Eastern and African migrants into the EU. Staying in the EU will only accelerate the decline of the West, including Britain. If anything staying in the EU is the worse possible thing we can do – especially with the current block of British hating politicians, our Establishment and the Marxist Left wing in the UK, hiding behind such banners as the SNP, the LibDems, Labour Party, Greens and Plaid Cymru.

    Leaving the EU is only one part of the solution – the next part requires the election of Politicians who care about Britain and its future, after the dross have been removed (politically of course).

     
    Reply
    1. You are spot on. Brexit is step one. Leftie eradication is step 2. Forced repatriation of all criminals and illegals is step 3.

      Then take a breather. The country would already be a much pleasanter place.

      Reintroduce hanging, make it that murderers and multiple raplists crimes back 30 years hang.

      Take a breather.

      Nigel Farage, Donal Trump, Paul Weston – three excellent candidates,

       
      Reply
      1. Athens invented Democracy. And Democracy destroyed Athens. Democracy is destroying England.What you describe is the abandonment of UK Democracy which could be a lifesaver.
        Democracy has way passed its use-by date and should be replaced with a semi police state; as in the nations these high crime migrants originate from, where clearly democracy just doesn’t work. This cant be done by existing powerbrokers. Some kind of revolution seems necessary to preserve British whites. Its a big ask.

         
        Reply
  3. One should take into account, however,the fact that “White British” are considered a separate group from “other White” in every demographic study in the UK. Ergo, even if the worst happens and nothing changes in 50 years, minority White British is nota the same as minority White.

     
    Reply
    1. The official figures are a deliberate lie, designed to conceal the horrific extent of immigration and prevent a nationalist party gaining power.

      London must be 75% Asian/African, the native white people visible there in the day time commute in and out.

       
      Reply
  4. Yes.

    Agreed.

    BUT – I still strongly believe that * for the generation now living* leaving the EU at the first opportunity is the best course of action.

    Firstly, EU membership can and only and will only exacerbate the terrible non-white immigration situation. The million or so fakers who invaded the EU in the past year will eventually ALL be given citizenship of an EU state. A huge number will use that citizenship to move in in Britain to paratize the British welfare state. The EU’s madcao immigration policy based in the worthless outdated 1951 amended 1968 Geneva Convention simply CANNOT be abrogated by any EU state – it’s written into the damned EU constitution. So basically, the EU is f*cked and f*cked up forever and ever into the future.

    Secondly, British rejection of the EU can only work to hasten the end of this horrible monstrosity.
    A further point is that the articles of the EU – enforced by the European Court which has legal supremacy over all member courts – expressly forbid ‘racial discrimination’ ie no supposed ‘sovereign’ EU member state can ever take action that is deemed ‘racially discriminatory’ . In order to eject and deter third world invaders this, explicitly, MUST be done. In theory, a free sovereign independent state can do this. Third world nations regularly expel whole nationalities in the basis of ‘nationality’ and nationality only. Therefore, if you entertain that forlorn hope, and for no other reason, you should root for ‘bre it’.

     
    Reply
  5. Yes, the writing is on the wall as we very well know. The West is being overwhelmed by a world population of 7.5 billion; half of them in abject poverty and hundreds of millions running away from sectarian wars that they will inflict on any host country that takes in people from well-known ideological backgrounds. I’m afraid it’s just the numbers game in which incompetent and corrupted people will gain power because of their ethnicity and their ethnic majorities. The civilised attributes of countries in Europe will be their downfall. But people should vote to leave the EU in the UK as that is the only possible ray of light to create the circumstances necessary to redress this situation.

     
    Reply
  6. This future has been coming and predicted for many years but the UK public in their stupidity, naivety and cowardice have chosen to ignore it. They have voted for the same criminal traitors as they always have condemning the decent few and future generations to a Nightmare scenario. God Help Britain and God Help Europe.

     
    Reply
    1. those of us whom didn’t vote for this have no choice we have to accept the unacceptable same thing with the brixet I’m voting out but if the vote goes the other way we are stuffed

       
      Reply
    2. I agree.I despair at the attitude of British people.Their tolerant attitude toward immigrants especially muslims disgusts me.They have no idea the damage they have done against their own people.

       
      Reply
  7. here are some words the lib,lab,cons have bandied around for a few years, diversity one of their favourites, regeneration they love that one, multiculturalism thats the worst word ever sure you could all find a few more…………………

     
    Reply
    1. Yes all those words make me cringe. They are all political claptrap. Meaningless words that hide hideous outcomes but what did we expect from the politicians involved?

       
      Reply
  8. Yes the UK is probably doomed anyway but if we stay in the EU we are definitely doomed. Tony Blair gleefully set about the destruction of England. David Cameron let the program continue at full speed. It is the biggest betrayal in history.

     
    Reply
    1. Its not impossible Blair’s head could finish up on a muslim pike, paraded thru London. A great muslim trophy it would be. Does Blair seriously think he can safely and happily live unmolested in the third world Frankenstein nation of his own creation?
      How long before London declares itself a Muslim Caliphate? Will there ever be another white mayor of London?

       
      Reply
  9. People didn’t vote for this. You forget that back in the 90s the Labour party pursued an immigration policy in great secrecy whereby Mandelson (who is Jewish) personally trawled African nations persuading natives minding their own business to come to the UK. Ordinary citizens were left in the dark about this for years – an act of great treachery. Incidentally Blair also repealed the death penalty for treason while he was at it.

    Cameron pledged to reduce net immigration to the tens of thousands (although it is unclear whether he meant by reducing incoming migration or increasing outgoing migration of indigenous Brits feeling pushed out). Many disaffected voters were leaning toward UKIP in the general elections last year yet after polls showed a close tie between Labour and the Tories, many swung back to the Tories, for fear of a “lost” vote for UKIP (given FPTP electoral system)handing the even more disastrous Miliband/Labour the win.

    It only emerged afterwards that internal Tory polls had them in the lead all along yet this was not reflected in public polls – another act of treachery.

    As it was, 4 million votes (12.6%) for Ukip netted one arguably trojan horse MP, while the SNP with 1.5 million votes (4.7%) gained 56 seats!

    That is how the British have been “represented”.

     
    Reply
    1. This why we must have proper PR not the LibDums lashup of the referendum.Strangely considering how unpopular both of the old parties are they might find they need PR to get a few seats.

       
      Reply
  10. I reckon about 25 to 35 million non indigenous. I know this seems a huge percentage, but the official figures are deliberately falsified. I drive a lot in the South of England and when bored conduct a survey of drivers ethnicity. 30%+ are non European.

    When traveling in Northern towns this is even more apparent.

    The provision of halal food in schools and hospitals and its presence in every supermarket show that aliens are no longer a minority but now represent a large part of the population.

    This became far more blatant during the Last years of the “jew labour” regime , when even the nicest English towns were “enriched” – This was not incompetence – it was deliberate biological sabotage.

     
    Reply
  11. I’m afraid that for once I have to disagree with certain of the New Observer’s editorial assertions made in the article above.

    The claim, (the position has) “….everything to do with the immigration policies pursued by successive British governments, for which the people of Britain have continuously voted”, is simply wrong. The British people have never, “continuously voted” for massive immigration. Indeed, I suspect that had the people actually been asked whether they wanted vast numbers of culturally very different people to reside in the UK, the Blair Government (at that time) would have received a resounding and unanimous, “NO”. This despite the growing number of the deluded Multiculturalists arguing otherwise. The Blair Government opened the floodgates to immigrants, mainly Muslims and this never appeared in any Manifesto. They simply encouraged it irrespective of so-called “Democracy” and the voters opinions. So it is completely wrong to claim, if effect, that the British voter has somehow ended up with what they voted for. Admittedly, the UK has been mismanaged for decades but this is more to to with no alternatives. Look at UKIP: Four and a half million or so voted for them during the last election resulting in one MP.

    All the predictions above and contained in the Frontex document 2016 ignore a simple fact of physics. The Brit, Isaac Newton, stated in 1687 that,
    “Every body continues in it state of rest or or uniform motion in a straight line unless compelled by some external force to act otherwise”. What it needs is a monumental event to occur to shove the dire predictions off course.

    If Islam is a merciful religion, maybe Allah or Mohammed could tear themselves away from the Vestal Virgins and return to engage in the white folks dilemma. They could persuade their followers that the white folk have become largely peaceable and that the Muslim has no place within that state of affairs. The followers could also be persuaded to return to the Middle East where they could resume warring against their dictators, corruption and the inter-faith differences that have existed for centuries. Muslims being dedicated to their faith will surely see the benefits of returning to their own war zones instead of endeavouring to convert Europe to their way of living which will eventually end up the same way.
    So there, I believe that science has an answer!

     
    Reply
  12. Until the rise of UKIP your voting choice was between 3 parties all of whom supported immigration,EU etc ,4 million people woke up ,hopefully the rest will and we will get a true British government at long last.A start would be a massive vote UKIP in the local elections.

     
    Reply
  13. Stop all the corruption and fraud that is allowed to fester and grow in the UK – and many of the immigrants will leave anyway!

     
    Reply
  14. As an expat desiring to retire to THE Uk i have completely changed my mind. Seeing the result of this indiscriminate immigration.
    There is only one thing to be done by a strong leader.
    All Muslims who require sharia law instead of British law, will be invited to return to a sharia country that will fit their ways. They should be aided to return presto.
    All colored who refuse to work should not receive any welfare or free housing.
    Responsibility for them selves will be the only criteria. The ramshackle areas where they live must be sanitized and made livable. No more third world areas.
    Whites encouraged to have more children, only citizens to receive child welfare.
    Is this harsh? Well, it is about time it was done.

     
    Reply
    1. Rosina, despite what many feel about the anti-racist campaigner and ex head of the British Equalities Commission, he has put forward some findings of a poll which is hard to criticise. No doubt the multiculturalists will suggest it is simply, “Scaremongering”. Follow this link for the summary article:
      http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/article-3533041/Warning-UK-Muslim-ghettoes-Nation-nation-developing-says-former-equalities-watchdog.html

      The TV programme can be watched on Channel 4 at 2200 Hrs Wednesday 13.04.16. No doubt it will be made available to view on the internet. I suggest the populations and Governments of all countries where the Muslim has a foothold should read/watch and take heed as the UK is already far further down the road of unrestricted Muslimisation than most. Indeed, this poll of Muslim views can be set against the backdrop of the recent statistics referred to in this TNO article.

      It was quite telling that Trevor Phillips, in an interview 11.04.16 with the BBC, referred a, “Nation within a Nation”. Right now the concept of the Muslim minority within the UK majority is simply a staging post. The essence of the TNO article above and the statistics it mentions
      vis a vis the proportions in 2066, will sooner or later result in the Brits being in the minority in their own country. They will have to live with Sharia Law and the other manifestations of other failed Muslim countries. I agree with many of your views but before the point of no return is reached, a UK Government will have to take a grip and make some really hard decisions which will probably result abandonment of so-called, “Human Rights” and blood on the streets in UK cities. The only conclusion that can be objectively reached is that since the UK has suffered a succession of weak leaders (or otherwise becoming megalomaniacs such as Margaret Thatcher) the UK is doomed.

      Personally I see a plan for the Muslimisation of the World being played out. Can there be an alternative aspiration for Muslims? They up roots and move to the West only for what? To change the receiving country to what they vacated.

      Remember, you cannot distinguish between a “radicalised” Muslim and every other Muslim. In my view, praying four or five times (the norm) a day starting sometimes at 0400 Hrs in the morning is seriously “radical”. I will not be around in 2066 and have no issue so, its all academic to me.

       
      Reply
    1. I’d close that mosque. In fact I’d close EVERY mosque in the UK and deport every last muslim to the lands of their forefathers!

       
      Reply
      1. Send them back to a country where they were not safe (which mostly all Muslim countries are)? Fraid that would be country their Human Rights…………….

         
        Reply
  15. I think we should honestly take the attitude that if we are called islamophobic /racist we should agree we are. I admit I am islamophobic due to their attitude and constant threats that they shall rule UK and they shall have Sharia law. Placards with F**k of uk police, etc. Its monstrous. We must get out of the EU. It would give us a good head start to preventing our (white british) demise. So many comments I have read and many with good ideas as to how to rid them or some from our Country. There seems to be a sense of guilt to from comments on here. You should not , not ever feel guilty. It seriously is not our fault that immigrants have been coming to Britain for years and years. I blame the governments as I am now positive that ever since Edward Heath signed that blessed document to take us into the so called EEC, (which of course was the EU but they betrayed us then) the government, stepped up the immigration policy. They knew we were going into the EU. They knew all about the New World Order Plan and must have known the scheme to cause genocide of the white european. Yes, that does make them sound evil but its true. They earn such high salaries and stash abroad!! Cameron is probably looking forward to an excellent job in the EU with extra high salary again! I realised ages ago what was going on especially after reading the Coudenhove – Kalergi Plan. I began searching for more stuff on the internet and it was shocking, the things I found. The NWO is obviously run by a bunch of psychos, which often happens when they are bored billionaires 10 times over! The Rothschilds and Rockefellers. The Vatican is all in with it. Google and read Sinister Sites – EU parliament. It was first time I took a look at the EU poster and the poster is truthfully described on that site., particularly the pentagrams. Yes,,Evil Ruling. Ask google anything about the EU. I went on UTube and asked if it was corrupt. Yes. I watched and listened to the Aaron Russo interviews. Nice guy now passed away. Really was an eye opener.

     
    Reply
  16. The invaders don’t want to work so by 2066 Britain will be a welfare state and probably very similar to Syria now, these invaders don’t bring anything but trouble with them

     
    Reply
  17. Get out of the EU, then give muslims the boot. They shouldn’t run the country! Let’s send them back to their countries, they can have their mosques, their sharia laws, their halal food and do what strikes their fancy ON THEIR COUNTRIES, NOT OURS.

     
    Reply
  18. The “Elephant in the Room” is the outrageous Commonwealth Voting Rights of Non-British Citizens from 56 Commonwealth countries to vote in British elections. To his immense credit, Lord Andrew Green of Migration Watch has been campaigning for years and years to abolish these voting rights and restore democracy, all in vain.

    THAT is why the British “appear” to have voted for mass invasion. The votes of the indigenous British population have been consistently SWAMPED by voters from the Third World, who will also be allowed to vote in the EU referendum, unlike 2 million British ex-pats who have just been denied voting rights. All the Invaders need is a UK address for a Postal Vote, and only need to have visited relatives in the UK at any time during the past 15 years. In fact, none of these requirements are checked by anyone, and it is possible to register to vote by telephone, online, etc. with no background checks of any kind. So Bangladeshis living in Bangladesh will be deciding on whether Britain should stay in the EU and lose control of its own borders.

    Most Brits are not even aware of this, and if it is pointed out to them, seem to react with a kind of stunned “cognitive dissonance”, then retreat into mumbling rationalizations, then carry on as before, boldly announcing how we will vote to leave the EU. As someone said, no matter how the Brits vote, we will wake up the next morning and find that we have somehow, mysteriously, voted to remain in the EU.

     
    Reply
  19. One possible explanation for Commonwealth citizens having the right to vote in the UK could be because the British Empire still have exists. Former colonies being given limited independence (while promoted as full independence) and the British Empire merely been rebranded as The Commonwealth.

     
    Reply
  20. The task of regaining our country from those who would destroy it (and have had a good deal of success so far) is an enormous one. Every day that we allow the enemy to continue unopposed steepens the curve of our demise.

    Winning the referendum (the first battle in the ongoing war) is the start but we cannot allow our present government to ignore it or conspire with the EU to avoid it altogether. We need to take action; the “eutruth” website has some interesting numbers on what is needed to succeed.

    We need to get serious about this or we will lose. Don’t be confused by my moniker; I have some outstanding business overseas but will return soon to join the fight for the future of ourselves and, more importantly, our kids and the others who will come after us. For now I have a trusted proxy to place my vote.

     
    Reply
    1. I feel a massive foreboding for what’s to come after this Referendum. I work off the basis that I was conned by both the Labour and Conservative Parties in 1975 and I am sure it is happening all over again. With the obvious blatant lies and deceit the population have all been subjected to over the last few months, would you trust any one of the serial liars to actually do the right thing?
      I have had email exchanges with a leading Conservative Brexiteer and in those exchanges it is very obvious that that persons concern is not for the wishes on the people. That persons principal concern is with the continuance of the Conservative Party and to avoid a leadership contest at all costs.
      Ponder for one moment on day 1 of a ‘Leave’ winning – 24.06.16: ‘Head’s you win, tails you win’ Cameron will still be PM and his Eton ‘Sidekick’ will still be in the Milking Parlour at Number 11. Think about it. The UK population having voted ‘Leave’ with a heavy heart principally over immigration, will be faced with the continuance of, not only that Islam, EU and Globalist supporting duo, but their international supporting friends who, in any event, will not be at all anxious to allow proof to develop that they were all wrong with their predictions. How can Cameron ‘negotiate’ the UK’s way out of the EU, as a declared supporter? Membership of that cabal, in my view will continue. Earlier this year we watched Cameron’s wasted but “tireless efforts” to so-called, ‘negotiate’ a new deal and this same person would be aiming to get a ‘good (exit) deal’ for the UK? I don’t think so. It may be brinkmanship but what if? What if the EU suddenly announces that under pressure (from other States of course) they will be prepared to suspend Free Movement? What then? A snap election to confirm the ‘new’ Conservative Manifesto which will include remaining in the EU and, a hazy, indistinct, vague commitment to ‘explore’ reformation of the EU. The masses will jump at it.
      Whatever happens, there’s no indication whatever that the Eton duo will work assiduously and relentlessly to achieve a clean ‘Out’ or indeed any benefit for the particular likes and aspirations of the contributors to the New Observer Online. Indeed, quite the opposite. The Islamification of the UK will continue unaffected as will all the rest. No change.
      If the UK had the right leader, dare I say a Farage character, we would have change in the right direction and plenty of it. But all I see ‘Out’ or ‘In’ is the same politics.

       
      Reply
    2. To ExpatDavid, re: “The task of regaining our country from those who would destroy it” Who specifically are those who keep your country and would destroy it? How specifically would they destroy it? I assume you believe Britain’s leaving the EU will prevent the alleged destruction of Britain. How will prevent? One more question. In an interview, Farage said, “We owe to the Africans and Asians” (or something of this sort), hinted it is they who should live and work in Britain. Do you agree with him?

       
      Reply
  21. If it were late, to fix the damage done to Britain, in its decision to withdraw from the European Union, how worse would it be for current EU member-states who would definitely one day decide to also withdraw??

     
    Reply
    1. To Joseph M. Cachia, but is it actually beneficial to Britain to withdraw from the EU? That is, to do as wishes, among others, Mr Desmond (Jewish). The leading pornographer in Britain. The owner of the rabidly anti-EU tabloid the Daily Express. And a strong supporter, also financial, of Farage and UKiP. However imperfect the EU may be, it’s still a significant attempt in uniting the European peoples. Just think: if the British break ties with the EU, kick out European migrant workers (the propaganda of Mr Dsemond and co. especially brutally vilifies the meek and hard-working Poles), then they will further reinforce ties with the Third World and the torrent of immigrants from there. That’s what actually Farage, Cameron, Johnson (ex-mayor of the largely Third-World London) and others from the British political elite are in favor of. Part of the British public doesn’t appear to see this. Or perhaps they see and quietly agree with it? The British, perhaps except the Scottish, traditionally seem to have been Europhobic. Well, but would the Europhobia be to their advantage this time?

       
      Reply

Post Comment