Clinton: Destroy Syria for Israel

A newly-released Hilary Clinton email confirmed that the Obama administration has deliberately provoked the civil war in Syria as the “best way to help Israel.”

In an indication of her murderous and psychopathic nature, Clinton also wrote that it was the “right thing” to personally threaten Bashar Assad’s family with death.

Clinton-Syria-destruction

In the email, released by Wikileaks, then Secretary of State Clinton says that the “best way to help Israel” is to “use force” in Syria to overthrow the government.

The document was one of many unclassified by the US Department of State under case number F-2014-20439, Doc No. C05794498, following the uproar over Clinton’s private email server kept at her house while she served as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013.

Although the Wikileaks transcript dates the email as December 31, 2000, this is an error on their part, as the contents of the email (in particular the reference to May 2012 talks between Iran and the west over its nuclear program in Istanbul) show that the email was in fact sent on December 31, 2012.

The email makes it clear that it has been US policy from the very beginning to violently overthrow the Syrian government—and specifically to do this because it is in Israel’s interests.

C05794498-1

“The best way to help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad,” Clinton forthrightly starts off by saying.

Even though all US intelligence reports had long dismissed Iran’s “atom bomb” program as a hoax (a conclusion supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency), Clinton continues to use these lies to “justify” destroying Syria in the name of Israel.

READ  Telegraph: Nigerians and Crime

She specifically links Iran’s mythical atom bomb program to Syria because, she says, Iran’s “atom bomb” program threatens Israel’s “monopoly” on nuclear weapons in the Middle East.

If Iran were to acquire a nuclear weapon, Clinton asserts, this would allow Syria (and other “adversaries of Israel” such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt) to “go nuclear as well,” all of which would threaten Israel’s interests.

Therefore, Clinton, says, Syria has to be destroyed.

Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s civil war may seem unconnected, but they are. What Israeli military leaders really worry about — but cannot talk about — is losing their nuclear monopoly.

An Iranian nuclear weapons capability would not only end that nuclear monopoly but could also prompt other adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to go nuclear as well. The result would be a precarious nuclear balance in which Israel could not respond to provocations with conventional military strikes on Syria and Lebanon, as it can today.

If Iran were to reach the threshold of a nuclear weapons state, Tehran would find it much easier to call on its allies in Syria and Hezbollah to strike Israel, knowing that its nuclear weapons would serve as a deterrent to Israel responding against Iran itself.

It is, Clinton continues, the “strategic relationship between Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria” that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel’s security.

This would not come about through a “direct attack,” Clinton admits, because “in the thirty years of hostility between Iran and Israel” this has never occurred, but through its alleged “proxies.”

The end of the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance. Israel’s leadership understands well why defeating Assad is now in its interests.

Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel’s security, it would also ease Israel’s understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly.

Then, Israel and the United States might be able to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous that military action could be warranted.

Clinton goes on to asset that directly threatening Bashar Assad “and his family” with violence is the “right thing” to do:

In short, the White House can ease the tension that has developed with Israel over Iran by doing the right thing in Syria.

With his life and his family at risk, only the threat or use of force will change the Syrian dictator Bashar Assad’s mind.

The email proves—as if any more proof was needed—that the US government has been the main sponsor of the growth of terrorism in the Middle East, and all in order to “protect” Israel.

READ  Swedes Fail to Mix Invaders with Old People

It is also a sobering thought to consider that the “refugee” crisis which currently threatens to destroy Europe, was directly sparked off by this US government action as well, insofar as there are any genuine refugees fleeing the civil war in Syria.

In addition, over 250,000 people have been killed in the Syrian conflict, which has spread to Iraq—all thanks to Clinton and the Obama administration backing the “rebels” and stoking the fires of war in Syria.

The real and disturbing possibility that a psychopath like Clinton—whose policy has inflicted death and misery upon millions of people—could become the next president of America is the most deeply shocking thought of all.

Clinton’s public assertion that, if elected president, she would “take the relationship with Israel to the next level,” would definitively mark her, and Israel, as the enemy of not just some Arab states in the Middle East, but of all peace-loving people on earth.

33 thoughts on “Clinton: Destroy Syria for Israel

    1. Alongside Merkel, Camewrong, Hollande and many more. If this murderous b***h is placed in the white house we really do have problems.

       
  1. If Clinton and Merkel are typical of women politicos thank heavens females never figured so much before.
    We`d have been racing to hell in a handcart years ago.

     
  2. Never heard of the Oded Yinon Plan?
    Probably not, as those three words get you kicked off the comments page on any newspaper but this. Likewise the COUDENHOVE KALERGI Plan.

     
  3. Just a small correction on the date of the email, it appears this was probably from late April, not December, of 2012.

    Wikileaks has this mistakenly dated as having been from 2000, but the email mentions nuclear talks starting in Istanbul (April 14, 2012), a week-old CNN interview with Ehud Barak (aired April 19, 2012: http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1204/19/ampr.01.html), and mentions the rebellion in Syria having been started over a year ago (began April 2011).

    So, keep in mind when reading through this – it was written roughly a week and a half after the first “constructive nuclear talk”(http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-17716241) between Iran and the US, UK, France, China, Russia and Germany in 2012.

     
    1. I appreciate the pun, but you’re playing into the hands of anti-whites, anti-Germans, and Jews. Hitler, as is clear enough, had more integrity than most politicians.

       
  4. Well finally a US secretary of state has openly confirmed via email, which everyone has assumed all along……that Israel is in possession of nuclear weapons!

     
      1. It’s been believed, because it was printed in the Jewish press for years. that doesn’t mean it’s true.

         
  5. @antieu An evil pair, Obama and Clinton. They should be in the Hague!

    Along with Sarkozy Cameron for calling for a “no fly zone” over Libya to get rid of Qaddafi for their Zionist pals and not to mention Bush, Blair and half the Labour cabinet who instigated war with Iraq for the same goals, the Western Leaders have a lot to answer for.

     
  6. The truth will set us free. Thank you Killary for being STUPID enough to “write” such atrocities… I thought you guys were WAY smarter…

     
  7. Wolfowitz Doctrine

    Wolfowitz Doctrine is an unofficial name given to the initial version of the Defense Planning Guidance for the 1994–99 fiscal years (dated February 18, 1992) authored by Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Paul Wolfowitz and his deputy Scooter Libby. Not intended for public release, it was leaked to the New York Times on March 7, 1992,[1] and sparked a public controversy about U.S. foreign and defense policy. The document was widely criticized as imperialist as the document outlined a policy of unilateralism and pre-emptive military action to suppress potential threats from other nations and prevent any other nation from rising to superpower status.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfowitz_Doctrine

     
    1. Yes,1992 was the year in which the beginnings of the formation of the PNAC (Project for New American Century), a think tank (now removed or defunct, possibly set up in another unknown entity), from which came the "bible" for endless wars and more, entitled "REBUILDING AMERICA’S DEFENSES — Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century" — REBUILDING AMERICA’S DEFENSES — Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century  ….. A Report of The Project for the New American Century September 2000. Just a cursory reading of this document tells you the picture of what literally became the "blueprint" which was acted upon.  

       
    2. A draft was released to the New York Times by “an official who believ[ed] this post-cold war strategy debate should be carried out in the public domain.”
      The official who leaked it deserved a medal. We`d all remain none the wiser about such underhand machinations of government otherwise.

       
  8. If I was an Israeli official, I would be mad as heck at this. Israel has refused to admit that it has nuclear capability. Now we have the US Secretary of State trying to figure out ways to maintain “Israel’s nuclear monopoly.”

     
  9. Again when all the behind the scenes information comes to light we are right again.

    The ageing Europhobic babyboomers types you will see involved in anti war groups like the ‘Stop the War coalition’ project that middle east intervention is caused by vague ‘corporations’, ‘military industrial complex’, European xenaphobia and implicitly that national borders are the issue.

    Shock and horror the whole Neo-con scheme gains it’s legitimacy and financial support from internationalist jewish politics and jewish businessmen who support one thing in the West then another thing for Israel.

     
  10. October 03, 2012 Provoke an Attack on Iran? “Lets Bring it On… At the End of the Day… We Ought to Take ‘Em Out”

    Is the Obama administration seeking to trigger a war pretext incident, a justification to wage an all out war on Iran? Provoking a war and then blaming the enemy for carrying out an act of aggression is no longer part of a hidden agenda, a safely guarded secret as in the case of Pearl Harbor (1941) which was used by the FDR administration as a justification for America’s entry into the Second World War.

    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=799_1348921063

     
  11. Shahid Hussain Raja

    - Edit

    Reply

    Israel is the biggest beneficiary of the present Syrian crises whether these are resolved or not as these crises have provided her a golden opportunity to consolidate her position for any foreseeable future. All her potential enemies are being neutralised one by one while the Middle East itself has been pushed into internecine and sectarian wars for at least next half a century.
    Syria and Iran are the two countries in the Middle East which have been resisting the hegemony of Israel for the last 6 decades. Amos Yaldin, former Israeli Intelligence Chief rightly believed that Syrian military “which is a huge threat to Israel, is now also weakening and, in a way, disintegrating. We still have risk from Syria– a risk of being an Al Qaeda country, a Somalia-type country — but from military point of view, each one of these is less dangerous than the Syrian regular army.”

     
  12. Israel has had nuclear weapons for years – I thought it was a well known fact.

    Well America after reading this article do you still want a psychopath for president. You should have her committed for life because she obviously is not right in the head. All I can say is God help America if she is voted in. Israel has always wanted Syria to be divided up into small states so that they will be easier to overrun and taken into Israel just like the Golan Heights. I think the UN criticised Israel for not returning the Golan Heights to Syria but of course Israel just thumbs its nose at the UN.

     
  13. I find it interesting that no one said a darned thing when FRANCE and Russia were first volunteering to build /help build Iran’s nuclear reactor. Now that it is built, going after it is like closing the barn door after all the cows got out. Sooo… somehow picking a war in Syria is somehow supposed to affect Iran’s nuclear power?
    Strange reasoning there, besides being just as criminal as their supporting radical Jihadists and the bombing of Libya’s military forces in the overthrow of Gadaffi. I seem to remember that the vast majority of citizenry supported Gaddaffi as well, but that does not count with Jezebel Killery .

     
  14. why do ppl pay taxes to support these criminals? Do you honestly think if u stopped paying taxes that healthcare would collapse or get worse than it already is?? those billions go to israel to commit their atrocities against humanity.

     
  15. These things have been more or less known by those who have followed the situation from the time Wesley Clark talked about taking 7 countries in 5 years at the onset of the Iraq invasion. The Clinton e-mails certainly corroborate everything.
    The Jews have total control of the US foreign policy and instigate all the wars. One thing that also makes it possible is their control of all the wealth of the US through their control of the so called “Federal Bank,” which is a private net flowing into the web of the Zionist world banks enabling a consolidation of global power in the grip of the greatest blood sucking operation of all time.

     

Add Comment