England: 5,702 FGM Cases in 2015–16

The Third World practice of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) has become firmly entrenched in England with the mass invasion of that country by Africans and Asians, new figures from the government’s Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) have revealed.

At least 5,702 cases of FGM were reported in England during the 2015–16 year—and the true figure is likely to be much higher as these were only cases reported by local health authorities.

The figures also exclude any reporting from Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, which have also been affected by the Third World invasion.


According to the report, FGM is most prevalent in the Third World-overrun majority nonwhite metropolis of London, where 52 percent of the cases were reported.

Furthermore, 90 percent of the women and girls with a known country of birth were born in an Eastern, Northern, or Western African country, and 6 percent were born in Asia.

Somalia in Eastern Africa accounted for more than one third of all newly recorded cases for women and girls with a known country of birth (37 percent).

Other countries with a large volume of cases include Eritrea in Eastern Africa, the Sudan in Northern Africa, and Nigeria and the Gambia in Western Africa.

Some 43 newly recorded cases of FGM involved women and girls reported to have been born in the United Kingdom. Of those with a known FGM type, more than 40 percent were reported with “FGM Type 4–Piercing,” the report said.

Where the FGM Type is known, “Types 1 and 2” have the highest incidence (35 and 31 percent respectively).

Type I is defined as clitoridectomy, or the partial or total removal of the clitoris and/or the prepuce. Type II, also called excision, involves the partial or total removal of the clitoris and the labia minora, with or without excision of the labia majora.

The most frequent age range at which the FGM was carried out was between 5 and 9 years old, involving 43 percent of cases where the age was known.

The full extent of the Third World invasion is revealed in the report’s listing of the countries of birth of the reported cases: Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, Egypt, Sudan, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Malaysia, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen.

Women and girls born in Somalia account for 37 percent of the cases, and the 5 to 9 year old age group was the most common age range at which FGM was undertaken.

Significantly, a growing proportion of the reported FGM cases were carried out in England, meaning that the practice is being carried over from generation to generation.

FGM has been illegal in Britain since 1985, but the compulsory reporting of cases by that country’s health authorities has only been in force since last year, and the new report is the first such one to be made.

The full extent of FGM remains unknown, as the reported cases are only those which have been spotted by doctors working in the U.K.’s National Health Service (NHS).

In 2014, a Somali “doctor” named Ali Mao-Aweys was struck off the U.K.’s medical register after he told an undercover reporter that he could arrange for female circumcision to be carried out on two girls aged 10 and 13.

Recommended For You


  1. One of the side-effects of Britain’s membership in “the Commonwealth”? A 53-nation entity, predominantly Third World, including EIGHTEEN African “states” such as Cameroon, Lesotho, Malawi and Namibia. Or perhaps it’s the EU that the female genital mutilators and mutilees come from?

    1. Anyone blaming the EU for everything (common in Britain) including its huge immigration problem should read the list of countries above who have obviously all been given asylum here. What do we really want, white Christian hardworking poles, or low IQ, unemployable, benefit-guzzling black Africans and backward Muslims like those on this list of shame?? “Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, Egypt, Sudan, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Malaysia, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen”. THAT is the reality of politically correct, multiculturalism-obsessed Britain and its bleak future. Europeans not welcome, but black African or Muslim? Come on in. If anyone dares criticise you we’ll get the “hate police” onto them. Get in illegally and lawyers and do-gooders will crawl out of the woodwork to fight your deportation.

      1. Will, but are the British really in favor of the Third World masses from the Commonwealth living in Britain or they aren’t, just don’t express it? I could never figure this out while travelling in the UK. When asked, the British, especially English, would just clam up. I kept on asking and they would just keep on being silent and poker-faced. Weird. 🙂

        1. Brainwashed, Excuse Me. Brainwashed into believing anything derogatorily said regarding immigrants will be deemed to be ‘Racist’ and therefore a criminal offence. The process of criminalisation of ‘racism’ has been going on for decades and each successive piece of legislation piles more jail time on the previous. The Liberal/Left elite have had a historic, ‘field day’. This is not to mention gay marriage and transgender sickness.

        2. The vast majority is against it, but it’s become dangerous to speak out. There are “hate police” all over the country, and there are even units monitoring the Internet. Britain is so obsessed with multiculturalism, that almost any criticism of blacks or Muslims could end up with an appearance in court. A couple in Scotland who put bacon on a mosque door were given prison sentences of nine and 12 months. Outrageous.

      2. Well said, WillG. Unlike most immigrants from MENA, Poles want to work. When it comes to the issue of their accepting lower wages in UK, people should not ignore the fact that 1,5 million Ukrainians – who arrived within the stretch of the last two years – work in Poland. Naturally, Ukrainians get lower wages than Poles, so beneficial is the financial system to the countries native populations.

        1. Thanks G. So you think it’s not that the British, especially English, are kind of inherently Europhobic and, in spite of their European looks and façade, really thirdworld? So you think they have merely been brainwashed and intimidated, e.g. by harsh criminal sanctions, into backing the “multikulti”, including Third World immigration and its wrecking of Britain? Do you think it’s possible they can be re-brainwashed and gotten back to their Euroroots, or it’s too late now?

          1. Yikes! Brits aren`t allowed to mention the trashing of our country by people from elsewhere.
            We certainly gripe, moan and spit feathers with family and friends about the takeover of
            our country but not openly. That`s verboten!
            Not sure where you`re from Excuse Me, but in the UK Joe Public doesn`t have any
            say about who comes into this country. It`s decided by TPTB behind closed doors.
            Nowadays the EU – courtesy of Merkel – decides which lot to dump on us next, and the lower echelons of the elite all jump to carry out her orders.

          2. Hi Excuse Me.
            Well, I think that there’s a small window of opportunity open right now and it will be open for 5 years at the most. Problem is, surveying the so-called, ‘Leader’s’ we have at the present time, I conclude there’s no one I would have the confidence in making World shattering decisions and being prepared to face the wrath of the other Lab/Lib/Multi/Culti leaders around the World. The action required to halt and reverse the mess will suffer the Worlds condemnation that’s for sure. Meanwhile we, in the UK and Europe should get used to use of the word: “Dhimmitude”. I’ll not give an explanation as the Internet more generally does a pretty good job of it.

    2. Well said, Excuse Me. The last set of figures for immigration to the UK revealed that it was roughly ‘half-and-half’ from the EU and elsewhere. You highlight the ‘elsewhere’ in your contribution and are quite right to do so. It is in this half that the British Government stand any chance of reducing the numbers to, “the tens of thousands” NOW but, they have failed and will continue to fail since the approach is appeasement. ‘Appeasement’ to the nations you list some of that once were controlled by the UK in the “Commonwealth” and the nations which kicked out the UK decades ago. Look what’s happened to them since: are they really models of good democracy at work? What legacy did we leave behind?
      Meanwhile the stinking rotting pile of refuse (the UK) lurches on with more savages by the month. So, as regards FGM, what can you expect? Good ol’ NHS I say, busily setting up clinics all over the UK to deal with the avalanche of FGM. £2.5 Billion deficit? What the hell! A few more billion and even longer queues for routine treatment for the indigenous Brits. Who cares? – Your Government certainly doesn’t.

      1. G, as I understand, “dhimmitude” means one’s remaining in an inferior religious, economical, legal, etc. position to the Muslims. Is this really that bad yonder? If so, why get used to it instead of kicking against?

        1. Here, let me help you Excuse Me.

          This website is devoted to ‘Dhimmitude’ –

          If you bother to visit this website you will find a full definition there.
          Dhimmitude relates basically to, (I quote) “the Islamic system of governing populations conquered by jihad wars, encompassing all of the demographic, ethnic, and religious aspects of the political system.”
          You clearly are blind to ‘connotations’ and missing any point or implication, ask, “Is this really that bad yonder(?)”. I’ll say it is! And if you cannot spot the connotations or implications of my previous contribution then you had best seek an explanation elsewhere.

          1. G, your definition of the dhi… doesn’t seem to contradict mine. And my question therefore remains: if it’s really that bad yonder, why get used to it? .

  2. What does Farage and UKiP say about the FGM phenomenon in Britain? Do they blame the EU and say the mutilators and mutilees are the Poles? UKiP supporters, how about supporting the UK’s pulling out of the Third World Commonwealth? THIS would be the real way to start fixing Britain instead of irrelevant and inane “Brexit” from the EU.

    1. The EU is a political union in which each country agrees to policies tying them further and further into one European State in which they must all agree to jump in sync. with Merkel. A totalitarian state in the making.
      Your particular hobby horse keeps pulling in two directions while seeking forage ….or Farage.
      Why on earth would we secede from the Commonwealth ? All the member countries are autonomous which is why I voted for Brexit. Like Farage I want to live in an independent country once again.

      1. I don’t get what you mean by my alleged “particular hobby horse”, etc. Is it some kind of metaphor? Any evidence that the EU is a “totalitarian state”? In what way the British membership in the EU allegedly deprives Britain of independence? Please give facts, not faragean slogans. Even if all the Third World Commonwealth “countries” were “autonomous,” would this change the reality of the incessant massive immigration from those countries into Britain? Since you say you don’t see any reason for Britain’s seceding from such a Commonwealth, it follows you are for the immigration. Yes or no?

      2. We should ABOLISH THE COMMONWEALTH, and renew ties with our own cousins in Australia, New Zealand & Canada, ABOLISHING the ludicrous VOTING RIGHTS of all Commonwealth citizens in British elections, resulting in MASSIVE ELECTORAL FRAUD from POSTAL BALLOTS collected from anyone in 53 Third World countries who has ever even visited relatives in the UK, or even not at all, because the Electoral Register officials never check ANYTHING or ANYONE.

        The Commonwealth is just another PARASITIC DRAIN on Britain.

        1. Why not pull out of the Third World Commonwealth and strengthen ties with Europe? I don’t mean necessarily the (imperfect and unwieldy) EU; the EU could eventually go and be replaced with a better European structure. Britain could help with its creation. Such strengthening ties with Europe seems a more natural and realistic thing to do for Britain than strengthening ties with the remote NZ, Australia, Canada. The more so as the three have become by now as multiculturalized and thirdworldized as Britain has. Or worse. I’m afraid that in order to make them look as British-like as they did some 30 years ago, you’d have to go to war. So shouldn’t you renew and strengthen ties with Europe and Europeans instead?

          1. Patriotism, nationalism, national ethnic identity, monogamous family structures and Christianity are the only things standing in the way of the Globalist Totalitarian Dream. That is why they are trying to destroy them, and all atheists & pagans should ask themselves why it is that only Christianity upsets the Globalists, and no other religion.

            The Globalist New Feudal World Order wants to abolish all nations, so the reasonable thing to do is the OPPOSITE. There is no reason why Wales, Scotland and Ulster cannot declare independence and become sovereign nations managing their own affairs. Britain, particularly England which is being parasitized by all the others, needs to first break FREE from the tentacles of ALL these conglomerations like Europe and the Commonwealth, and establish friendly but independent relations with all, as Switzerland has done for most of its history.

    2. As FGM is practised by immigrants living across all of the EU countries why single out the UK yet again?
      The place to start is in the backward ( but independent) countries where children are mutilated.
      Ban all future immigration from those places and return people settled here back to the independent countries they originally came from. The status quo would still be the same.

      1. Any evidence that FGM is allegedly “practiced by immigrants living across all of the EU countries”? So your argument is: “Since FGM is also practiced outside UK, then it’s all right it is practiced in UK”? Are you trying to divert attention away from the subject of FGM abuses in Britain? Mind you, the article is about those abuses in Britain, not elsewhere.

        1. Actually ExcuseMe, I originally thought that way and I bothered to re-read the TNO article two or three times. On my reading, the article does not refer to FGM actually taking place in the UK.

          1. I think I get what you mean; the article indeed doesn’t refer to the whole of UK, just England.

        2. No country has the right to decide – much less implement – what happens in any other autonomous
          However, people in other countries can protest and lobby and goverments may apply pressure.
          The EU works differently. All 28 member countries have to agree Laws and Treaties in the main.
          Some countries are even allowed an opt clause to some parts.
          However Human Rights can always be relied on to put a convenient spanner in the works
          so what people thought they had, when it comes down to it actually they hadn`t.
          As regards FGM clamping down on the guilty who have colluded in any way whatsoever is not even
          taken further in the 28 EU countries who profess to abhor mutilation of girls. All talk and no action.

      2. Bramble, it seems like a neat idea: England breaking free from Scotland, Wales and Ulster (and from the Commonfilth, oops, Commonwealth?), then becoming a neutral country like Switzerland. But how feasible at present? How about the supposed paradises of neutrality or separateness in Europe TODAY, such as Switzerland, Sweden, Norway? Aren’t they heavily packed with Third World masses too?

    1. A cruel ritual that often is performed by the poor girl’s own mother or other close female relative. Can we live in harmony with people who can subject their loved ones to such practice?

  3. What hypocrites people are! Outraged by the genital mutilation of females, but APPROVING the genital mutilation of males!
    Male Circumcision is just as DEPRAVED A RITUAL MUTILATION as female.

    1. I agree that circumcision is wrong, but it improves hygiene and males still enjoy sex.
      Not so the females, large numbers of whom suffer pain, bleeding and other consequences throughout their lives and have problems when giving birth. Husbands from backward cultures favour FGM as the wife that experiences no sexual enjoyment isn`t likely to stray.

      1. It is a COMPLETE LIE that circumcision “improves hygiene”.

        THYMOS: Journal of Boyhood Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1, Spring 2010, 78-90


        – Dan Bollinger

        “Abstract: Baby boys can and do succumb as a result of having their foreskin removed. Circumcision-related mortality rates are not known with certainty; this study estimates the scale of this problem. This study finds that approximately 117 neonatal circumcision-related deaths (9.01/100,000) occur annually in the United States, about 1.3% of male neonatal deaths from all causes. Because infant circumcision is elective, all of these deaths are avoidable.”

  4. Circumcision facliltates improved hygiene with particular reference to males not given to frequent washing.
    It is certainly not a ` complete lie`.

    1. RUBBISH! You could say the same of females—it’s a ridiculous attempt to justify an ancient Babylonian symbolic castration ritual that causes horrific pain, suffering and even death to helpless babies.

      1. This bogus “hygiene” argument is like saying, “Let’s cut off boys’ ears, because they never wash behind them! It would improve hygiene!”

  5. “Since the 1980s, private hospitals have been involved in the business of supplying discarded foreskins to private bio-research laboratories and pharmaceutical companies who require human flesh as raw research material. They also supply foreskins to transnational corporations such as Advanced Tissue Sciences of San Diego, California, [1] Organogenesis, [2] and BioSurface Technology, [3] who have recently emerged to reap new corporate profits from the sale of marketable products made from harvested human foreskins. In 1996 alone, Advanced Tissue Sciences could boast of a healthy $663.9 million market capitalization performance.[4]”

    from: “A short history of the institutionalization of involuntary sexual mutilation in the United States”. Hodges F. in: Denniston GC, Milos MF (eds). Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy. New York: Plenum Press. 1997:17-40.

  6. it is beyond me why the parents are not being prosecuted. it should be publicized: we are going to have a health examination in school every year. if you are being found guilty, you will be deported, if that is not possible, you go to jail.

    1. antje, it is my understanding that most of these cases involve many new immigrants presenting themselves and/or being referred by a GP rather that FGM being carried out in the UK.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.