The Jewish Neocon conspiracy to destabilize the Middle East in order to reduce the threat to Israel has suffered a major setback with the unexpected Russian military intervention which now seems to be on the point of crushing the Syrian “rebels.”
The Neocon plan to destroy Iraq, Syria, and Iran, was first committed to paper back in 1996 when David Wurmser, then working for an Israeli think tank, The Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS), presented its outline to an IASPS conference held in July of that year.
The paper, “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,” which can be found here, said that the Israeli-Palestinian peace process was leading to a forfeiture of Israel’s “strategic initiative” and that the
loss of national critical mass was illustrated best by Israel’s efforts to draw in the United States to sell unpopular policies domestically . . . Israel has the opportunity to make a clean break; to secure the nation’s streets and borders in the immediate future, Israel can:
Work closely with Turkey and Jordan to contain, destabilize, and roll-back some of its most dangerous threats.
Forge a new basis for relations with the United States—stressing self-reliance, maturity, strategic cooperation on areas of mutual concern, and furthering values inherent to the West.
Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria.
This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq—an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right—as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions.
Since Iraq’s future could affect the strategic balance in the Middle East profoundly, it would be understandable that Israel has an interest in supporting the Hashemites in their efforts to redefine Iraq . . . Were the Hashemites to control Iraq, they could use their influence over Najf to help Israel wean the south Lebanese Shia away from Hezbollah, Iran, and Syria.
In other words, it became an openly declared policy goal by Israel to destroy Iraq, and, ultimately Syria as well, simply because they were opposed to the Zionist state.
The steps which then followed are outlined in the article “Iraq Crisis—Inevitable Consequence of the Jewish Lobby’s Planned Middle East Warmongering” (The New Observer, June 13, 2014).
As a result of the Jewish lobby’s manipulation of the US government, America has not only waged a covert war against Iran over that country’s mythical “atom bombs,”—but also, when the Syrian “civil war” started, went out of its way to support the mercenary “rebels” who all turned out to be radical Islamists.
Now however, these carefully laid—and nearly completed—plans to destroy the secular Bashar al-Assad government have been halted with a series of devastating attacks by Russian forces on Syrian “rebel” bases.
The attacks—which have greatly angered the Jewish lobby and their current White House puppet, Barack Obama—have not been limited to “ISIS” targets only, but have included the so-called “moderate” rebels who are also supplied, armed, and trained by the US government.
Although the US government has claimed to be only supplying these “moderate” rebels, the reality—as they know full well—is that these “moderates” have almost all defected to ISIS or Al-Qaeda aligned groups, making the distinction senseless.
The Russian airforce’s impressive bombing campaign has already reportedly destroyed more of ISIS’s military capability within three days than all of the US’s attempts over the past two years—yet another indication of the half-hearted and deliberately misleading nature of the US “intervention.”
Russian targets included the IS stronghold of Raqqa, but also Aleppo, Hama and Idlib, all provinces with little ISIS presence.
This fact caused Obama to announce that the Russian attacks were “strengthening” ISIS rather than weakening it—because, he said, it was “driving moderate opposition underground.” This nonsensical claim is based only on the fact that the Russian intervention is aimed at keeping Assad in power—something which is not part of the overall Jewish lobby gameplan.
Vladimir Putin’s intervention in Syria is therefore going to have repercussions beyond what even the Russian leader has foreseen, on both a personal and macro-political level.
Putin is already hated by the controlled western media for his firm stance on traditional heterosexual family rights, and his government’s rejection of the promotion of homosexuality. Now, his intervention in Syria at a critical moment when the Jewish Neocon plan to bring about Assad’s downfall was nearly complete, will stoke the fires of resentment and hatred against him and Russia to a new height.
The Russian government has not foreseen how vicious and violent the West’s Jewish lobby can be, and a ramping up of international tensions therefore seems set to be a certainty.