ANC Leader: “Seize Land from Whites”

The newly-elected leader of South Africa’s African National Congress—and therefore the country’s next president—Cyril Ramaphosa has announced that his administration will implement a policy of land seizures from whites “without compensation.”

According to reports in South African media,  Ramaphosa made the remarks while addressing a meeting with the Zulu King Goodwill Zwelithini at the latter’s Osuthu Palace over the past weekend.

 “South Africa could turn into the ultimate paradise with the implementation of the policy of expropriation of land without compensation,” Ramaphosa was reported as saying.

“In fact, it is possible for us to begin a process of working the land and improving agriculture – making it a very successful factor in our country,” he continued.

“We can make this country the garden of Eden,” Ramaphosa added.

In his address, Zwelithini urged Ramaphosa to pursue this policy.  He said that “only a very small proportion” of the people had had their land returned to them. We look to you to act…with speed.”

Even though “land reform” in South Africa has already been implemented—and shown to be an utter failure—it is still widely believed among blacks that whites continue to somehow trick everyone else into maintaining a position of superiority in that country.





This belief stems from the factually incorrect theory that whites “stole” the land from Africans during the colonial era.

In fact, as the historical record shows, the only land occupied by the black tribes during the colonial era—the eastern Cape, most of the eastern seaboard and immediate interior (today the province of Kwa-Zulu Natal) and scattered areas in the north and west of the old “Transvaal” province, were left in possession of those tribes.

For the greatest part (and with very few exceptions), white settlers set up farms, towns and even cities in regions which had no black inhabitants at all. Blacks were however drawn to these areas when offered work and soon became the majority population in those regions thanks to their far higher birth rate and through taking advantage of white-provided medical systems, money, food, and education.

In that way, the formerly white areas of occupation became majority nonwhite—an important lesson of the utter failure of segregation, or “apartheid,” as a means of preserving racial identity.

Ultimately, then, it makes little difference who “occupied the land first”—all that really counts is who occupies the land now.

And in this sense, the demise of organized agriculture—and South Africa’s food production process—is therefore inevitably doomed to destruction as the Third World sets about eradicating the last First World European infrastructure.

Recommended reading: The Great South African Land Scandal.


Recommended For You

8 Comments

  1. Seems like SAi s destined to go the same way as Zim. The Rand will become worthless and rampant inflation…….

    1. If the whites there haven’t seen the writing on the wall before, surely the time is now.

      They can either choose succession (the world would never allow it) or leave for Europe.

  2. Surely, when South African whites voted for De Klerk – and his referendum – they knew what they were voting for. And the character of the black African.

  3. … Naaa . Just Chi com wanting a total ‘extermination’ of locals, to finally, clear the way for them and their colonisation of Africa. .

  4. No need to stress too much over Ramaphosa’s latest pronouncements. South African politicians tailor their speeches to suit the audience of the moment. No-one expects anything else, and if challenged everything can be denied or at least deemed to have been taken out of context. Besides, Africans do not accept the notion of reality, except as it exists at the present moment: the past, like the future, has an infinite number of possibilities. In particular, the past can be changed simply by stating that something did, or didn’t, happen. Once such a “virtual” past event has been postulated the originator of this event to all intents and purposes appears to believe it himself, and no proof to the contrary will persuade him otherwise. The most egregious misdemeanours are routinely denied, and the perpetrator apparently outraged when eventually proved to have lied. It’s an African thing, so don’t sweat it.

    1. That is quite an astonishing analysis of how African people view reality, and a real eye-opener. It shows the total clash of civilizations between that and traditional Christian European morality, so detested by the Globalists, who are trying to destroy it by Mass Third World Invasion and Marxist Subversion.

  5. I saw the writing on the wall in 1986. It was there in brilliant neon lights. One did not have to be too bright to know where it was going. So, I with the wife 2 young daughters got going. Best decision of our lives. 28 years of one great experience in Australia. However it looks like it’s likely to deteriorate as the lefties for some reason seem to think that African migrants are the best thing.
    I warned an employer in Melbourne back in 2000 about AFRICAN MIGRANTS which he thought was pretty rude. Wonder how he feels about it now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.