Nonwhite invaders in Europe are soon going to be sent to Norwegian-developed “anti-rape” classes where they will be asked if “violence is ever justified” and “how do you know if a woman is consenting to sex,” it has emerged.
The program, developed by a Norwegian company to “teach” nonwhite invaders not to rape white women, is being rolled out across Europe in the hope that it will combat their ongoing mass sex-attack plague.
According to the Italian Il Mattino newspaper, an international conference was held in Norway on January 27, where delegates from “migration agencies” around Europe were given a tutorial on how to “teach” the nonwhites to stop attacking white women after they get to Europe.
The Norwegian NRK news service reported that international interest in the “rape prevention” courses was high because it is “the only one of its kind in Europe.”
The course, run by Linda Hagen, was developed by the private company she works for, Hero, which has been awarded a contract to run a large number of “asylum centers” in Norway.
Hero decided to start the courses after a series of brutal rapes and attacks by nonwhite invaders in the southwestern town of Stavanger between 2009 and 2011, but they only attracted attention after the mass sex attacks which took place over the New Year in Cologne and other cities around Europe.
The course itself was demonstrated to the public earlier, where, it emerged, that the nonwhites are taught the “answers” to the questions such as:
“What is the difference between love and sex?”
“Can the use of violence be legitimate?” [to obtain sex]
“How do you know if a woman is consenting to sex?”
Of course, it does not occur to the race-blind liberals that the “answers” to questions such as these are obvious—and anyone, from anywhere, who does not know the correct answer to each question, is literally a mental defective.
In addition, the “course” also shows the nonwhite invaders a picture of a beautiful white woman in a short skirt—and they are then told that women with such clothing are not issuing “an invitation for sex.”
The course also emphasizes that it is not acceptable to “use violence against women”—another typically inverted liberal way of saying that in the invaders’ home nations, violence against women is an accepted way of life.
Another part of the course consists of a video of two (“white”) youngsters at a party. After drinking alcohol, the girl and the boy go upstairs into a bedroom, and kiss and embrace on a bed. The boy then becomes increasingly physical and pulls off her panties, while she expresses increasing unease. The video then ends with a message saying “No means no.”
The nonwhites are then asked for their reaction to the video. Their reactions, as reported by the AFP news service, were probably not what the course organizer would have preferred:
“She kissed him—it’s an invitation to have sex,” one said.
“If she wants come to my place, that means she’s consenting,” another one said.
“But I have friends, they come from a different culture, from a strict family. For them, any part a woman shows (is) a sign she wants to have sex,” another says.
“He tricked her but the girl should also have been clear and said no and not gone upstairs with him,” another one said.
“If a girl kisses me, I figure she wants to sleep with me,” yet another one said.
Flustered, Hagen later explained to AFP that there were many “gray areas” which had come about due to “cultural misunderstandings.”