“Sh*t Hole” Countries by Race and IQ

US President Donald Trump may or may not have used the word “sh*t hole” to describe Haiti and African countries—but it has focused attention on the fact that all black-ruled nations are  economic and social disaster zones—caused directly by average IQs of between 66 and 75.

The obvious connection between race, IQ, and achievement is apparent from the fact that the tiny European city state of Liechtenstein (population 37,000) has a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) larger than 14 African states, while Belgium (pop. 11m) and Australia (pop. 24m) have a GDP larger than 41 African states and their population of more than 990 million all added together—definitive proof that achievement is linked to race, and not “environment.”

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is a measure of the value of economic activity within a country—the sum of the market values, or prices, of all final goods and services produced in an economy during a period of time.

According to GDP data issued by the World Bank, and population figures provided from the United Nations, the combined GDP of 41 sub-Saharan African states are as follows:

Angola has a GDP of  $89.6 billion, and a population of 29.7 million,

Benin has a GDP of  8.5 billion, and a population of 11.1 million,

Botswana has a GDP of $15.2 billion, and a population of 2.2 million,

Burkina Faso has a GDP of $12.1 billion, and a population of 19.1 million,

Burundi has a GDP of $3 billion, and a population of 10.8 million,

Cameroon has a GDP of $24.2 billion, and a population of 24 million,

Central African Republic has a GDP of $1.7 billion, and a population of 46 million,

Chad has a GDP of $9.6 billion, and a population of 14.8 million,

Democratic Republic of the Congo has a GDP of $34.9 billion, and a population of 81.3 million,

Djibouti has a GDP of $1.7 billion, and a population of 0.9 million,

Equatorial Guinea has a GDP of $10.1 billion, and a population of 1.2 million,

Eritrea has a GDP of $2.6 billion, and a population of 5 million,

Ethiopia has a GDP of $72.3 billion, and a population of 104.9 million,

Gabon has a GDP of $14.2 billion, and a population of 2 million,

Gambia has a GDP of $0.9 billion, and a population of 2.1 million,

Ghana has a GDP of $42.6 billion, and a population of 28.8 million,

Guinea Bissau has a GDP of $1.1 billion, and a population of 1.8 million,

Guinea has a GDP of $0.2 billion, and a population of 12.7 million,

Ivory Coast has a GDP of $36.1 billion, and a population of 24.2 million,

Kenya has a GDP of $70.5 billion, and a population of 49.6 million,

Lesotho has a GDP of $2.2 billion, and a population of 2.2 million,

Liberia has a GDP of $2.1 billion, and a population of 4.7 million,

Malawi has a GDP of $5.4 billion, and a population of 18.6 million,

Mali has a GDP of $14.0 billion, and a population of 18.5 million,

Mauritania has a GDP of $4.6 billion, and a population of 4.4 million,

Mozambique has a GDP of $11 billion, and a population of 29 million,

Namibia has a GDP of $10.2 billion, and a population of 2.5 million,

Niger has a GDP of $7.5 billion, and a population of 21.4 million,

Nigeria has a GDP of $405 billion, and a population of 191 million,

Republic of the Congo has a GDP of $7.8 billion, and a population of 5.2 million,

Rwanda has a GDP of $8.3 billion, and a population of 12.2 million,

Senegal has a GDP of $14.7 billion, and a population of 15.8 million,

Sierra Leone has a GDP of $3.6 billion, and a population of 7.5 million,

Somalia has a GDP of $6.2 billion, and a population of 2.1 million,

Sudan has a GDP of $95.5 billion, and a population of 40.5 million,

Swaziland has a GDP of $3.7 billion, and a population of 1.3 million,

Tanzania has a GDP of $47.4 billion, and a population of 57.1 million,

Togo has a GDP of $4.4 billion, and a population of 7.7 million,





Uganda has a GDP of $25.5 billion, and a population of 42.8 million,

Zambia has a GDP of $19.5 billion, and a population of  17 million, and

Zimbabwe has a GDP of $16.2 billion, and a population of 16.5 million.

Together, these 41 states have a combined GDP of $1165.9 billion, distributed among a population of 990 million.

These 41 sub-Saharan African states include oil-rich states such as Nigeria (which artificially boosts the GDP by over $405bn), but excludes South Africa, which still has a residual white-driven economy which has a GDP of $294bn—which is steadily declining (South Africa’s GDP was $416bn in 2011).

By contrast, the World Bank data shows that majority white Australia—only properly founded as a modern state in the 1850s—has a  GDP of $1.205 trillion (a trillion has 12 zeros) and a  population 24,4 million.

At least 70 percent of the Australian mainland is classified as semi-arid, arid or desert; and for all practical purposes, uninhabitable.

It suffers from droughts and other environmental problems equal to, or worse, than most of Africa—yet its GDP far outstrips that of all of black Africa combined.

There is only one explanation for the disparity in achievement: race, IQ, and the ability of the population.

This reality is that all of sub-Saharan Africa has an average IQ in the range between 59 and 80—and that the average sub-Saharan IQ is around 62.

According to the internationally-accepted Stanford-Binet scale of intelligence, an IQ of 80 to 89 is regarded as “dull,” while an IQ between 70 and 79 is “borderline deficiency,” and an IQ between 50 and 69 is officially classified as “moron.”

Further evidence of this massive disparity is evident from other data drawn from the World Bank GDP figures and the UN’s population data:

The country of Austria has a GDP of $386 billion, and a population of 8.7 million,

Belgium has a GDP of $466 billion, and a population of 11.4 million,

The Czech Republic has a GDP of $192.9 billion, and a population of 10.6 million,

Denmark has a GDP of $306 billion, and a population of 5.7 million,

Estonia has a GDP of $23.1 billion, and a population of 1.3 million,

Iceland has a GDP of $20 billion, and a population of 335,000,

Finland has a GDP of $236 billion, and a population of 5.5 million,

Germany has a GDP of $3.4 trillion, and a population of 82 million,

Luxembourg has a GDP 59.9 billion, and a population of 583,000,

Hungary has a GDP of $124.3 billion, and a population of 9.7 million, and

Liechtenstein has a GDP of $6.6 billion, and a population of 37,000.

There is no “environmental” reason for Africa’s backwardness. It is unquestionably the most mineral rich, and agriculturally perfect, region on earth.

The African Leadership magazine, in August 2015, admitted that “when it comes to the stuff bling is made of, Africa is enormously bountiful. Its mineral deposits make it one of the richest natural-resource-laden places on Earth.”

According to that article, Botswana is home to 35 percent of Africa’s diamonds, and the Democratic Republic of Congo is estimated to have more than $24 trillion worth of untapped raw mineral ore deposits, and is one of the greatest producers of diamonds (34 percent) and copper (13 percent) in Africa.

However, as that magazine admitted, “the DRC continues to suffer from corruption and crime, and has been forced to shut down many mining operations to curb illegal activity.”

Tanzania, the article continues, “has impressive deposits of iron ore, nickel, copper, cobalt, silver, diamond, and more.”

Namibia has “46 percent of the continent’s uranium” which “helps bring in nearly a quarter of Namibia’s annual income,” while Mozambique produces 32 percent of Africa’s aluminium.

“Zambia is home to somewhere between 65 percent to 77 percent of Africa’s copper supply,” while Guinea “is responsible for more than 95 percent of Africa’s bauxite production, while Ghana accounts for the remainder” Bauxite is crucial for aluminum production.

Ghana is Africa’s second-largest producer of gold after South Africa, and holds more than 15 percent of the continent’s supply.

Compare all of this to the country of Japan, which has almost no minerals at all, but as a GDP of $4.9 trillion—and it becomes clear that race is the reason for the disparity, not “geography”, “environment,” or any of the other reasons race-denying liberals use to “explain” African backwardness.

See also the following:

“There are no Successful Black Nations”

Haiti: Then and Now

A Third World Disaster Zone: UN Report on Haiti

Black Nations are Failures and Own Worst Enemies: Jamaican Govt. Official 

Nonwhite World Dominates Official “Failed States” List


Recommended For You

9 Comments

  1. Okay for that, but don’t use the example of Lichtenstein for GDP because it is a bank tax-haven and is getting its money that way. Count only what people actually produce through their direct efforts, not money-manipulation.

    1. We all have strengths & weaknesses. If those in Lichtenstein have a banking tax haven to produce wealth, good on them. Would you rather they sat on their backsides asking for benefit handouts. They are industrious within the bounds of their resources. A rare resource in anyone’s language!

  2. Correlation is not causation. There seems to be a correlation between race and IQ, but it is difficult to prove that race genetics is a factor in determining IQ when other factors like environment could also be relevant. Certainly most Africans do not live in an environment conducive to intellectual development. Many, if not most of them are rural dwellers who have received limited education and have no access to mass media or books. Most important of all, however, is the fact that their culture does not value scholarship, and traditionally scholarly achievement has not been a key to upward social mobility.

    Now contrast the situation in Africa with China in 1948 where the majority of the population were peasants living in extreme poverty, and sunk in ignorance and superstition. Somehow the Chinese have been able to overcome this backwardness to a far greater degree than Africa. My theory is that despite the initial backwardness of the majority of the population the Chinese have benefited from a two and half thousand year old culture which values scholarship and regards scholarly achievement as a path to upward social mobility. We should also bear in mind that the Chinese elite have maintained a level of cultural sophistication equal to that of Greek and Roman antiquity which has prepared them for the challenges of modernization. Africa, on the other hand, does not have such a valuable intellectual and artistic heritage on which to build.

    It now seems apparent that a people cannot overcome their heritage as easily as we believed that they could. We thought that once developing nations were provided with the knowledge and wisdom of the West that they would be able to use this information to rapidly modernize their societies, but this modernization has been incomplete and fraught with difficulties.

  3. North America was primitive, too – until the white anglo-saxon, Germanic and Scandinavian people became its occupants. Their industry and order took control. Negroes could NOT have accomplished or conceived the Republic of America. The shithole countries/regions are begotten by their dominant races.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.