“Right wing” hoopla over the official start of Brexit is completely misguided—because the most damaging European Court in terms of UK law is not part of the EU, thousands of EU laws are simply being transported wholesale onto British statute books—and the real cause of Britain’s decline is not the EU, but Third World immigration engineered by the British Parliament.
Firstly: Brexit advocates have quite falsely claimed that the European Court of Justice (ECJ) is the court which has “interfered” the most with “forcing” Britain to accept “human rights” dictates, allowing radical Muslims and immigrant criminals to stay in Britain.
The ECJ, officially called the Court of Justice, is indeed the highest court in the European Union—in matters of European Union law, and is tasked with interpreting EU law and ensuring its equal application across all EU member states.
However, the actual court which enforces “human rights” is the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)—which is a supra-national entity established in terms of the European Convention on Human Rights. This convention is a separate international treaty to “protect human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe,” drafted in 1950 by the then newly formed Council of Europe—a body which is still in existence and is completely separate from the European Union.
Britain is—and remains—a signatory to that Convention, and is—and remains—a contracting party to the Convention. There is therefore no justification for anyone to claim that Britain has now “escaped the application of human rights laws” through Brexit.
Secondly: More than 52,741 laws, passed by the European Parliament since 1990, are being transposed into UK law as part of the British government’s Great Repeal Bill. This means that thousands of laws which pro-Brexit campaigners said were “hampering” Britain are going to remain—and just be known as “British” law instead of “EU” law.
Thirdly, and most significantly, the real threat facing Britain’s continued existence as an independent First World nation has nothing to do with the European Union, and everything to do with the pro-Third World immigration policies actively pursued by all the British parties in the parliament in London.
Brexit campaigners have claimed that Third World immigration via the EU has posed a threat to Britain’s racial homogeneity—but the reality is that the number of Third Worlders who have entered Britain via the EU is tiny and numbers in the thousands—as compared to the millions who have entered via laws created by the British parliament.
For example, Professor David Coleman, Supernumerary Fellow in Human Sciences and University Professor in Demography at St. John’s College, Oxford, produced a study in 2013 which showed that the aftereffects of “decades of migration” and natural reproduction rates will have made the UK the West’s “most ethnically diverse nation after 2050.”
Furthermore, Professor Coleman said, white Britons will be an outright minority in the UK by the year 2066. Professor Coleman said migration has become the “primary driver of demographic change.”
According to the data—extracted from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) Census—as of 2011, around 20 percent of people in the UK are “nonwhite or non-British.” This percentage, the report said, is expected to rise to a quarter by 2025, a third by 2040, and reach up to 38 percent by 2050.
This has nothing to do with the EU, and everything to do with the immigration policies pursued by successive British governments, for which the people of Britain have continuously voted.
Professor Coleman’s 2012 report was based on the then current “net rates of immigration,” which had been running at more than 200,000 a year. The use of the words “net immigration” is, however, an old establishment political party trick to deceive the public about the true extent of Third World immigration into Britain.
The con works this way: they add up the total number of immigrants arriving in Britain, and then deduct from that number the total number of people leaving the country—and the difference is called “net immigration.”
In this way, 200,000 low-IQ sub-Saharan Africans coming into Britain are put on the same level as say, 50,000 white Britons retiring to Spain, or otherwise emigrating—and in this way, they justify the “stabilization” of the UK’s population, as if there has not really been any significant change at all.
The only way that this future can be averted is through a social and political revolution to halt and reverse Third World demographic replacement, and has nothing to do with membership of the European Union.
Perhaps the true nature of the “right wing” hoax was best illustrated with so-called “conservative” news outlet Breitbart’s coverage of the handing over of the “Article 50” letter to the European Union.
A banner headline on Breitbart urged its readers to “Remember Today, When Britain Pioneered Freedom for the World Again.”
The article was, however, written by the son of Gujarati immigrants from India, Raheem Kassam, who is also Editor in Chief of Breitbart London—and who was UKIP leader Nigel Farage’s most senior advisor.
The “right wingers” cheering on Brexit appear not to understand the significance of an Indian-origin UKIP activist telling them that their departure from the EU is a “day of freedom” for Britain.