Trump Administration to Strike Down Obama’s Anti-White College Admission Guidelines

The Trump Administration has drawn up plans to strike down the Obama-era “guidelines” for college admissions—which gave blacks and Hispanics preference over whites and Asians in student placements—the Wall Street Journal has reported.

According to the report, the Trump administration argues that the 2011 and 2016 Obama guidelines—which give universities the right to select black and Hispanic applicants with lower scores before whites with similar or higher scores—serve to “mislead schools to believe that legal forms of affirmative action are simpler to achieve than the law allows.”

The guidelines, Trump administration officials say, “go beyond what the Supreme Court has decided on the issue.”

The US Supreme Court has ruled universities may use affirmative action to help nonwhites get into college when otherwise they would fail to meet the entrance requirements, using the favorite standby excuse of “white racism” as the reason.

Of course, the lower scores are merely a reflection of racial differences in IQ and ability, and have nothing to do with “white racism,” as the fact that many Asians in America score as high, if not higher, than whites, and they are also excluded from the “affirmative action” program even though they are not white.





In fact, the Justice Department  has recently been investigating a complaint by more than 60 “Asian-American” organizations that say Harvard University’s policies are discriminatory because they limit the acceptance of Asian students on precisely this basis.

The Justice Department joined Students for Fair Admissions, the group behind the case, which has urged the disclosure of “powerful” evidence showing that Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Harvard is violating Title VI of the landmark 1964 Civil Rights Act. Title VI prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance.

Earlier, the New York Times said that the attack on the anti-white program will be run “out of the division’s front office, where the Trump administration’s political appointees work, rather than its Educational Opportunities Section, which is run by career civil servants.”

The Justice Department will be looking for “stark gaps in test scores and dropout rates among different racial cohorts within student bodies,” which “would be evidence suggesting that admissions offices were putting too great an emphasis on applicants’ race and crossing the line the Supreme Court has drawn,” the NYT added.

The Supreme Court most recently addressed affirmative action admissions policies in a 2016 case, voting 4 to 3 to uphold what it called a “race-conscious” program at the University of Texas at Austin—but which was in fact just another anti-white program.


Recommended For You

3 Comments

  1. It’s important to note that the president of Students for Fair Admissions, the organization that is the plaintiff in the lawsuit against Harvard University on behalf of Asians, is jewish: Edward Blum. This lawsuit is most likely a Trojan horse. If the Asians win and get a larger representation at Harvard (as they probably should), it will likely come at the expense of admitting even fewer White students. After all, the jews are historically the champions of fighting for the “rights” of non-Whites that always end up disproportionately harming Whites in the end. Although Harvard and all other universities already discriminate against Whites in a huge way, I believe that’s what this lawsuit is all about–not helping Asians, but harming White students even more in the process. But hey, the jews are fighting for “rights”.

    While 43% of the Harvard student body is listed as “White”, what isn’t widely shared is that 24% of that group is jewish, and jews supposedly only make up 2%-3% of the population. That’s an over-representation of nearly 1,200%. Meanwhile, REAL Whites only make up 19% of Harvard students at a time when Whites still comprise 68% of the U.S. population.

    1. Sounds correct. It reminds me of the cases of huge frauds by semi-literates. Is there a chance they are ‘advised’ by Jews on such matters as filling in forms, how to answer questions, how to set up hard-to-detect accounts etc? Yes, of course.

  2. Mean while, in Oz, the affirm action and low quality foreign student cohort have twisted the govt’s arms to give them – wait for it – ” PARTICIPATION” degrees. They cant pass an exam, even after they access the explosion of Asian cheating factories in Down Under academies so that they can hand in an amazingly talented assignment. Assessment for degree completion has been massaged to 70% assignment work. Any teacher worth their salt could see that a kid that cannot participate in tutorials, with some thing intelligent to say, could not have created this fancy looking assignment, but never mind. Its all too hard to monitor. I’m told , more n more uni’s are recruiting Asian teachers who have a tradition of looking the other way. The white local teachers threatened to go on strike when they were told to pass 95% of foreign students… no matter what.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.