North America

Trump, Clinton, Death Threats and Media Lies

The lying nature of the controlled media has been illustrated once again with the totally false allegation that Donald Trump threatened Hilary Clinton with “assassination”—and the fact that the same media has ignored countless genuine death threats against the Republican nominee.

Trump’s words do not in any way contain a “death threat” or even a suggestion of an “assassination” as the controlled media is now claiming.

All Trump said was that the NRA might find a way to counter Clinton’s attempts to do away with the second amendment—and nothing more.

trump-gun

The latest media-generated hoopla is based on Trump’s remarks that “Hillary wants to abolish, essentially abolish the Second Amendment. By the way, and if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. But the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know.”

The “Second Amendment people” are those Americans who support the second amendment to the U.S. constitution, which guarantees the right to bear arms. Their strongest organized lobby is the National Rifle Association (NRA), of which Trump is a member.

Even though Trump’s actual meaning is clear and obvious to any objective observer, the controlled media—full of hate and venom against Trump for upsetting their carefully planned fake election between the two originally chosen “princes”—Hilary Clinton and Jeb Bush—have deliberately distorted Trump’s meaning to insinuate that he meant to kill Clinton.

In the last 24 hours, for example, the Google News aggregator reported no less than 4,184 articles in every major news outlet repeating the false claim that Trump had threatened Clinton with assassination, and doubtless more will follow shortly.

READ  Spain: “Legal Immigrant” Terror Arrests

NYDN-Trump-must-go

bbc-trump-gun

At the same time that the controlled media pumps out this latest blatant lie, they continue to ignore the hundreds of very real death threats being made against Trump every day, openly on social media and elsewhere.



As the website heartst.com so accurately summed up:

Predictably, these same liberal media stenographers remained SILENT when Donald Trump’s life was threatened by unhinged individuals.

For example, they shrugged off the British madman who literally tried to assassinate Trump with a gun at one of his rallies in June. Michael Steven Sandford, 19, was arrested in Las Vegas after grabbing a police officer’s gun outside a Trump event; he told officers he drove all the way from California to kill the candidate.

Every single member of the media corruptocracy just laughed when Hollywood comedy tycoons [the Jew Sacha Baruch Cohen, of “Borat” fame] thought it would be “funny” to make a movie about Donald Trump getting AIDS. It wasn’t funny, though.

Journolist [sic] tweeps did not peep when an anti-Trump activist started raising money to send Trump to “the conflict zone of his choosing” [so that he could “get a Purple Heart, that decoration being for U.S. soldiers wounded in combat].

And look at all these people on Twitter who want Trump to die.

death-threast-04 death-threast-03 death-threast-02

Where is the outrage, “objective” media?

It is little wonder that public confidence in the controlled media is at an all-time low.

Prior to the Internet, the public had no option but to hear only what the controlled media had to say—but now the blindfolds have been removed, and the media controllers have been exposed for what they are: vicious, anti-white liars.

3 Comments

  1. A new kind of alternative media must be created both in North America and Europe. So far no alternative media has tried to transform the reader comments function of their web sites into a news aggregator function. If readers would provide the local contents it would be possible to replace ordinary local newspapers.

    Some very large tablets are now almost the same size as a newspaper. The resolution is good enough for a newspaper substitute.

    Since the distribution cost for delivering news to a tablet would be almost zero it should be possible to operate this kind of media outlet with a very small budget. I also think that it should be possible for some near mainstream media outlets to get very inexpensive Russian and Chinese news agency subscriptions (they would be extremely stupid if they would not do that). Television schedules should not be difficult to provide.

    The key to the success of a new kind of alternative media is probably to transform reader comments into local news and sometimes national news. Thereby, there would be almost no cost for media contents in addition to no costs for printing and distribution.

    Furthermore, it should be possible for the readers to provide their “reader comments” anonymously. That´s important. Readers should be allowed to use faked e-mail addresses or state no e-mail address at all.

     
    Reply

Post Comment