US States Can’t Stop “Syrian Refugees”

Individual US state governors who seek to block the resettlement of “Syrian refugees” are engaging in an elaborate hoax as they must be aware that they have no power at all to stop the process, a leading constitutional lawyer has said.


The lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous to protect himself against leftist retaliation, pointed out that the United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) is exclusively a federal mandate, and overrides any state abilities to halt it.


“The USRAP process, as laid down in law, states very clearly that the ability to grant refugees asylum in the US is controlled by the Executive Branch, and no one else,” the lawyer said.

This means that the determination is drafted by the president and his advisors alone, and Obama has already signified his intention to admit as many as he can.

“A Presidential Determination establishes the admissions levels and, importantly, the regional allocations of all refugees, and there is nothing that any state can do about this,” he said.

“Frankly, any governor who does not know this is astonishingly stupid, woefully uninformed, or just being deliberately malicious in presenting an elaborate hoax as a public front for voters,” he continued.

So far, the states of Alabama, Michigan, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin have announced opposition to the plan to bring in Syrian refugees.

* Republican Party presidential candidate front-runner Donald Trump told a 10,000-strong crowd in Knoxville, Tennessee, that if elected president, he would not allow any “Syrian refugees” to enter the US.

“We have a president that wants to take hundreds of thousands, hundreds of thousands, of people and move them into our country,” he said, while the crowd booed in disapproval.


Trump also called German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision to allow “refugees” into her country “a disgrace.”

Instead, he said, he would build a safe zone for refugees in Syria: “In Syria, take a big swatch of land, which believe me, you get for the right price, OK? You take a big swatch and you don’t destroy all of Europe.

“What I like is build a safe zone, it’s here, build a big beautiful safe zone and you have whatever it is so people can live.”

Trump also criticized gun control, saying that France had some of the strictest gun controls anywhere, which meant that the citizenry was unprotected against attackers like the Paris terrorists.

Had they been allowed to be armed, he said, “it would’ve been a totally different story, folks. There would have been a shootout at the OK corral, right? And you would have had death, but if would have been their [the terrorists’] death.”

Recommended For You


  1. Horse cookies, This is just propaganda to convince U.S. citizens that we are helpless. No one with a single brain cell would believe this. This is pure liberal thinking. Confuse us divide us and get us to argue amongst ourselves. Conquer us. Gov.’s always say this. Right up to the time they are no longer there.
    Anonymous shill talk, to scared to say he supports the status quo.
    The final authority will and has always been with the people. NO BILL OF RIGHTS NEEDED THERE. Birth right is always the fall back position. Think and Govern Yourself!!!

  2. What`s surprising about a Muslim President cramming as many of his Muslim mates as he can into America ? Seems logical ! With their votes he could be in the White House for decades.

    It`s the same here in Europe. Merkel isn`t Muslim but she`s dosing us with the same medicine.
    noman – suggest you google NWO [New World Order].

    1. Obama is America’s Merkel. ‘Fences don’t work, come one come all’. Of course Obama’s immigration policies will take many jobs away from black Americans.

  3. If this is true, Congress must explicitly remove this power from the Federal government executive branch. And impeach and arrest Obama and the other members of the neocon and globalist criminal cartel.

    In any event, I am sure a legal way can be found to prevent this — where there is a will, there is a way.

  4. Immigration laws


    The immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952, revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today.

    Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “force, violence or other unconstitutional means”.

    This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House.

    Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic.

    All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life guiding principle subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government.

    Now the political correct crowd would say the Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion. Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any “organization” that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited.

    * The facts can be found in The Constitution Immigration Law 414 chapter 2 section 212. The Constitution Immigration Law has 163 pages.

Leave a Reply to Mark Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.