The South African Parliament—which has an average IQ of just 77—today adopted a report to seize white property without compensation—at exactly the same time that electricity supplies across the country failed for the sixth day in a row due to the black state’s inability to keep its inherited white First World infrastructure functioning.
According to the South African Parliament’s official Twitter feed, the “National Assembly has [today] voted to adopt the report by the Constitutional Review Committee that recommended for the amendment of Section 25 of Constitutions to allow for the Expropriation of land without compensation #LandExpropriation.”
A total of 209 members of parliament—those belonging to the African National Congress and its allies, the openly anti-white Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) party, voted in favor of adopting the report, while the opposition Democratic Alliance and a handful of smaller parties brought out 91 votes against it.
The next step in the process is to submit the report for approval to the country’s national provincial administration’s “National Council of Provinces” at its meeting on November 5. That body is also controlled by the ANC.
Once adopted there, ANC chief whip Jackson Mthembu has announced that he will bring a motion to take process forward on Thursday, November 6.
At exactly the same time, South Africa suffered a sixth day of power blackouts as the state electricity supplier, Eskom, “took action to prevent a collapse of the national grid.”
According to an Eskom statement released on Tuesday, December 4, 2018, “as a result of a shortage of capacity due to a number of generating units still out of service due to breakdowns, Eskom will be implementing Stage 2 rotational loadshedding from 09:00 and this is likely to continue until 22:00.
“Stage 2 calls for 2000MW to be rotationally loadshed nationally at a given period. Loadshedding is conducted rotationally as a measure of last resort to protect the power system from a total collapse or blackout,” the Eskom statement continued, ending with an appeal to consumers to “use electricity sparingly during this period.”
“Please switch off geysers [water heaters] as well as all non-essential lighting and electricity appliances to assist in reducing demand,” the statement ended.
The South African FIN24 news service reported that this “means a return to stocking up on candles, mopping up thawed refrigerators and sitting in gridlocked roads around blank traffic lights. All of that became familiar in 2008, and again in 2015, when Eskom implemented months of the outages. Those cuts hamstrung the economy, limiting industrial output and hurting business and consumer confidence.”
According to London’s Financial Times, “Eskom was once regarded as one of the world’s best-run utilities but began to be plagued by blackouts about a decade ago as it fell behind on investing in capacity.”
The FT then goes on to blame criminal activity for the supplier’s collapse, ignoring the fact that Eskom was created in 1923 by the former white government nad functioned highly efficiently until the country was handed over to black rule—and its precipitous decline has followed since that handover, and not before.
The real reason for the collapse is of course the fact that South Africa has an average IQ of 77. According to the internationally-accepted Stanford-Binet scale of intelligence, an IQ between 70 and 79 is classed as “borderline deficiency,” and it is therefore clear that that country’s population is incapable of either developing or maintaining any form of society above tribal level.
This also explains why the Africans in that country’s parliament—an institution and indeed even a building which was built by the former white rulers—do not understand that there was no “theft” of African land during the colonial period, and that the areas occupied by blacks when the whites arrived were never seized or taken, but set aside for permanent black occupation in terms of the 1913 Land Act.
Later, thanks to white-provided employment, hospitals, schools and other infrastructure, the black population increased in numbers to majority occupy the country—but the fact remains that the vast majority of “white” farmland was never taken from the natives.
Nonetheless, the 77-IQ Africans do not accept this, and cling to the utterly false narrative that whites “took their land” and now seek to “take it back.”
This will, of course, end in predictable catastrophe, but the objective of inciting hatred against whites and blaming them for black failure, is, in the eyes of Africa, well worth the cost.