“The Great Replacement” Means the Extermination of the White Race through Mass Immigration

The phrase “Great Replacement”—in the news following its use by New Zealand mosque shooter Brenton Tarrant—means exactly that: the extermination of the white race in its historic homelands through mass Third World immigration, a process which left to run its course, will see whites plummet to minority in most western European states, North America, Australia and New Zealand within the next 30 or 40 years—and then be utterly smothered to extinction within a few decades after that.

Although liberal media outlets are denying that this is reality—because they are part of the grand plan to make this extermination process possible—all the facts show clearly that whites are being replaced in all their homelands, and only the outright liars of the controlled media could dare to claim otherwise.

In the United States of America, for example, according to official US Census Bureau predictions from March 2018, the US is set to become majority nonwhite by 2045—or in just 27 years’ time.

During that year, the US Census Bureau said, “whites” will comprise 49.7 percent of the population in contrast to 24.6 percent for Hispanics, 13.1 percent for blacks, 7.9 percent for Asians, and 3.8 percent for multiracial population.

Because nonwhites as a group are younger than whites, the minority white tipping point comes earlier for younger age groups. The census projections indicate that, for youth under 18–the post-millennial population–nonwhites will outnumber whites in 2020—less than two years away.

For those age 18-29–members of the younger labor force and voting age populations–the tipping point will occur in 2027.

By 2060, the census projects whites will comprise only 36 percent of the under age 18 population, with Hispanics accounting for 32 percent.

This prediction uses the infamously inaccurate federal definition of “white,” (which is “a person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa”)—so the actual number of whites is sure to be even less than the official statistics.

In Western Europe, much the same scenario is unfolding. In Britain, for example, the number of nonwhite pupils in UK primary schools as of 2012 was 27.1 percent of the total in primary schools, and 23.4 percent in secondary schools. At that rate of reproduction, nonwhites will be the majority of the population under the age of 21 in the UK by 2030—only 10 years away.

According to official statistics released by the UK government’s Department of Education, white British children have been effectively ethnically cleansed from most schools in greater London, Birmingham, Manchester, and parts of South Yorkshire and East Lancashire, with no less than 1,755 institutions—or one out of nine schools across the country—now having majority “non-English speaking pupils.”

Overall, given the mass nonwhite immigration into Britain underway since the 1960s, has led to the result that white British people will become an absolute minority in their homeland by 2066—at the very latest, and likely sooner.

As reported by Professor David Coleman, figures from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) show that “at current immigration levels” (that was written in 2010), the proportion of the white British-born population will fall from 80 percent to 59 percent by 2051.

“On those assumptions the ‘white British’ population would decline to 45 million by 2051,” Professor Coleman wrote. “Were the assumptions to hold, the ‘white British’ population of Britain would become the minority after about 2066.”

Importantly, he added that this was a “milestone that would be passed much earlier in younger age groups.” Professor Coleman’s point about the age-spread is of vital importance to understanding the full extent of the racial demographic replacement of white British people.

In 2014, for example, the median age in Britain was 40 years old, and some 58 percent of the population was older than that, according to official figures from the Office for National Statistics.

This means that within the next 35 years, the majority of that population will either have died, or be close to death—and the younger generations, which are, as Professor Coleman has pointed out, overwhelmingly nonwhite, will have replaced them.

In other words, the racial demographic collapse will happen suddenly, as the older white population dies off—a factor which is being rapidly sped up by the increasing and ongoing nonwhite “immigration,” as borne out by the fact that the white population was already only 79 percent of the total in 2011.

In June 2016, Professor Coleman repeated his prediction in Standpoint magazine.  His article, titled “Uncontrolled Immigration Means Finis Britanniae,” said that “rapid population growth, driven by the highest immigration in our history, is destabilising and transforming its population, its environment and its ethnic make-up into something quite new,” and that “migration accounted overall for 85 percent of population growth from 2001–2012.”

Professor Coleman pointed out that in the “1991 census, the nonwhite population, mostly of post-1960 immigrant origin, stood at 3 million or 6 percent of the total in England and Wales. By 2011 this had increased to nearly 8 million, or 14 percent of the total.

“Those describing themselves as ‘White British’ comprised 88 percent of the total population in 2001.





“But by the 2011 census, the ‘White British’ population in England and Wales had declined by 400,000, whereas the nonwhite population had increased by over three million, and the population describing itself as white but not British (many from Eastern Europe) had increased by just over a million.

“I made a projection in 2010 that if immigration stayed at its long-term rate of around 180,000 a year as it was at the time, the White British-born population would decline from 80 percent of the total then to just 59 percent in 2051,” Professor Coleman continued.

“Taking the projection to a more uncertain distance, the White British population would cease to be the majority in the U.K. by the late 2060s.

“However, should current high levels of immigration persist for any length of time, that date would move closer to the present. Britain would then become unrecognisable to its present inhabitants.

“Some people would welcome a brave new experiment, pioneering a wider world future. Others, though, might say ‘Finis Britanniae’.”

In France, economist and fund manager Charles Gave, writing for the think tank Institute des Libertes, pointed out that by 2057—that is, 40 years at the very most—France and Western Europe (which he called “Old Europe”) will have a majority nonwhite population with a Muslim majority.

 “And so, within 40 years at the latest, it is almost certain that the majority of the population will be Muslim in Austria, Germany, Spain, Italy, Belgium and Holland,” he wrote. “Again, these are not predictions but calculations, and I do not even call for new immigrants.”

The pace could be accelerated given continuing Muslim migration into France and other Western European states, either through regular legal processes or through fake refugees pouring into Europe from the Middle East and North Africa.

“Our summer will be really over the day when demographics will change, simply because we will have become a minority in our own countries and the majority will no longer pay attention to 68-year-old jeremiads, all of whose authors will be retired or dead,” he wrote.

“The immense news of the next 30 or 40 years will thus be the disappearance of the European populations, whose ancestors have created the modern world. And with these populations will disappear the diverse and complementary European nations that have made an immense success of the old continent for at least five centuries.”

In Australia, the same pattern is emerging. In 2016, a fertility map survey of Sydney, the most populous city in Australia, confirmed that immigration is allowing nonwhite Muslims from the Middle East to rapidly outbreed whites.

The “fertility map,” drawn up by social research company McCrindle, showed that many of the most fertile suburbs in Sydney are located in migrant clusters such as Lakemba, Auburn, Guildford, Punchbowl, and Bankstown—all popular with “families of Middle Eastern background.”

The appearance of the report was timed with official projections that Australia’s population will hit the 24 million mark next week, with the increase being almost solely due to legal nonwhite immigration from the Middle East and Asia.

The Australian Daily Telegraph marked the occasion by publishing an interview with the well-known neocon “conservative” writer from Canada, Mark Steyn, who often appears on shows such as those of Rush Limbaugh, Hugh Hewitt, and Sean Hannity.

According to the Daily Telegraph article, titled “Migrant birthrates are changing Australia: Average birthrate below replacement level,” the replacement of white people with Third Worlders in Australia is the “biggest story of our times, but political correctness has stifled debate so badly that politicians are too afraid to even talk about it.”

Steyn said politicians were underestimating how quickly societies can change. “Normally for a population transformation you need a Black Death, the Plague or a world war,” he said. “But in this case we are having it without any of that. That’s why it’s the most fascinating question of our times.”

The Daily Telegraph ended its online story with an editorial comment, saying that “Demography is destiny, as the saying goes. If there is any truth to this, Sydney in the future will be a substantially different place.”

The “Great Replacement” is therefore no myth. It is a reality, and no matter what the liberal-left and controlled media might say, unless it is halted, it will lead to the extermination of the white race in the Americas, Europe, and Australia/New Zealand.


Recommended For You

10 Comments

  1. With an average IQ of 100 points the white population becomes difficult to control by the ‘elites’. The solution?
    Blacks have an average IQ between 60 and 80 points. Mass immigration by blacks into white countries and the unevitable genetic mix between black and whites will lower the average IQ level of the population with 10 to 20 points within one generation. Since the black population will outnumber the white population many times, the average IQ will continue to drop with each new generation. This will ultimately result in a mixed far easier to control and much poorer population (less spending is good for the enviroment). The UN migration treaty and the UN climate treaty will work together in perfect harmony for the ‘greater’ good of humanity…

  2. The supreme irony is that the ‘Commissioners’ of the European Union will rule over a population that is not in any way shape or form European.

    And the filthy bastards keep trying to demonize Putin……

    1. No, the new proles of Europe won’t be European but that’s precisely the point when what’s being created is a global plantation.

  3. Here in Australia, it won’t be Muslims replacing whites, it will be Chinese and within much less time than 20-30 years. We have given ourselves over to Chinese land grabs while governments of all levels rake in the cash. Chinese spy networks are already established and we are being threatened by Russia and China. Late last year a Russian plane buzzed the north of Australia and a Chinese sub sailed down the west coast, all let through by Indonesia who also have designs on Australia that sent the military in to a panic (it was kept out of the media of course). The Chinese are also looting Australian, British and American naval vessels sunk in WWII off the Indonesian coast. Our government knows about it but won’t stop it. Put simply, Australia as a white nation is already dead.

  4. Future historians may see this demographic change as having great significance, but most of those living through it seemed unconcerned about it, or if they they are concerned they conceal their concerns from others, and perhaps from themselves. How do we explain the apparent indifference of the ruling class to this drastic change in society that most Europeans did not desire and many were opposed to? To understand this conundrum you have to get inside the mind of a typical liberal. Firstly they give primacy to economics and regard people as economic resources, so where these human economic resources originate is irrelevant as long as they can perform adequately in the workplace. Then there is the ideology of racism which makes selection of workers based on where they originate from taboo, especially if they are non Europeans and are racially distinct from the native population. Such discrimination is seen as unjust because any criteria for the selection of workers apart from their competence to perform adequately in the workplace is irrelevant, and if such criteria are a factor that results in their rejection this implies that they are regarded as inferior humans which is, of course, the great bugbear racism. There is also the ideology of civic nationalism to consider. This is defined by Wikipedia thus:
    .
    “Civic nationhood is a political identity built around shared citizenship within the state. Thus, a “civic nation” isn’t defined by its language or culture, but by its political institutions and liberal principles, which its citizens pledge to uphold. Membership in the civic nation is open to anyone who shares these values”
    .
    Therefore you can import any number of people from Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia and and as long as they accept ‘British values’ they become British, and everything stays the same. The idea of civic nationalism first developed in the world’s first great experiment in multiculturalism – the Roman Empire. It was believed that if their diverse population accepted Roman laws, institutions and language then they would become Romans. From our perspective it is doubtful that Germans and Egyptians ever really became Romans.
    .
    History has shown that large scale population transfers, especially between continents, results in profound cultural and political change, which maybe what the globalists really want. Perhaps they want distinct ethnic groups replaced by rootless cosmopolitans always ready to relocate themselves in response to the demands of international capitalism, and with no allegiance to a nation state.

  5. Not a fan of Mark (((Steyn))), but he said something once worth remembering. He said, “If the purpose of your culture is to celebrate multi-culture, that’s like saying, ‘We believe in everything’, which is the same as saying, ‘We believe in nothing’. Our core value is that we have no values.”

  6. “….unless it is halted, it will lead to the extermination of the white race in the Americas, Europe, and Australia/New Zealand.”

    If only it were that simple. The harsh reality is that even if we closed all the doors to Europe, North America, and Australia/New Zealand today and not one more immigrant ever entered…not one…we would still become minorities based on birth rates, present age, and other social dynamics. It would just take maybe one extra generation beyond these projections. There are FAR too many already inside the gates.

    It’s not enough for immigration to be stopped; it MUST be reversed entirely if we intend to live as Brits in Britain, Americans in America and so on. Otherwise, the only hope for survival as a group will be to leave our respective countries and regroup elsewhere to start again as a homogeneous nation, but where? And the UN/EU will certainly never allow that to happen.

  7. ‘Britishness’ is the camouflage that allows England’s destruction to progress unnoticed and frankly I’m sick of it. There’s a reason government and media continually refer to immigration as ‘British’ when it’s anything but. Immigration threatens England alone ands everyone knows it, just as they know that Scotland, a country England subsidises to the hilt, gets a free pass on the matter because the elites are intent on preserving one nation and destroying the other. Naming matters. Once they take your name they can do what they like. Please restore ours. For all our witlessness and timidity we’re the rightful owners. It’s depressing how ‘allies’ who take such little care in getting their facts right end up taking the same linguistic liberties.

    So you see Scotland won’t succumb. She’s too well connected. And since Scots are ‘British’ too (at least when the cash is being handed out) your prognostications might prove to be a little wide of the mark. It’s the Declaration of Arbroath that locates Scottish origins in and around modern day Ukraine and the same document which fuels that country’s efforts to attract migrants from the same part of the world as the antidote to falling population levels. In effect Scotland is cleverly passing off restoring its bloodline as a contribution to ‘Britain’s great multicultural experiment’ as the late Charles Kennedy once called it in parliament.

    Contrast the Englishman’s indifference toward home, hearth and even his children’s future, with regular bouts of enthusiasm for Scottish nationalism and the anti-English hatred that goes with it. Observe how each year English university students fan out across the globe to lie down in front of mechanical diggers in defence of Kalahari Bushmen while barely giving a second thought to their own land or families.

    There’s little room for optimism when you think, but even less when even racial nationalists fail to get their terminology right – or simply refuse to correct it. The people being wiped out here are English. ‘British’ and ‘English’ are not synonyms. The English are a people, a nation. They have a unique history and It would be nice if ‘allies’ had the decency to give us our right name for once. This would not only identify the problem correctly instead of burying it – and us – in the anonymity of ‘Britishness’. Crucially it would avoid continually endorsing the enemy’s misuse of language.

  8. This was all made possible by the Jewish and British attack on Germany in WW2. That sad point in history where Nationalism was labeled as “RACIST”. The Americans were duped into joining in through Jewish media propaganda, but the Jews and Britain’s unjust declaration of war was the root of our demise. If there truly is a place called HELL, I sure hope that disgusting SLOB Winston Churchill is there “BASTING”, just like he did to all the millions of German’s with white phosphorous.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.