Orania Strikes Back at Biased British Broadcasting Corporation Journalist

The Afrikaner renaissance is starting from its core in Orania, based on the traditional western principles of order, creativity, intellect, merit, and productivity, and has no need or desire to accept ANC or black majority rule, a leading businessman in that town has written in response to a typically biased article put out by a black journalist working for the BBC.

The article “Inside South Africa’s whites-only town of Orania,” by Pumza Fihlani, was a hodgepodge of half-truths and outright lies, designed to denigrate the attempts by the growing town to create a future for Afrikaners free of the shackles of the Third World.

It starts off by announcing that the “spirit of apartheid lives on” in the town, and then quickly descends into a deliberate series of misrepresentations, spelling errors and lies (some of which were so blatant that even the far-leftists who run the BBC have had to correct them.)

The article also quoted Orania bar owner and entrepreneur Quintin Diederichs—misspelling his name—as follows:

The owner, Quintin Diedericks, [sic] is well-travelled but became disillusioned with South Africa and moved to Orania with his wife, a beauty therapist, about four years ago. “It’s very safe here. We sleep with the doors unlocked. You can walk in the street at 3am without any fear. You don’t have that where you live,” he tells me.

He blames FW de Klerk, the last Afrikaner to rule South Africa, for the plight of his people.

“He gave away the country for nothing. We had the army,” he says and stops abruptly, beginning to shake his head.

In his response, published in the Vrye Afrikaner (“Free Afrikaner”) blog, Diederichs addressed himself directly to the journalist as follows:

Dear Pumza

I’m writing this letter in English even though I know that you speak fluent Afrikaans, unlike many who will read this letter, including your employers at the BBC.

During your stay in Orania, you and your colleagues from the BBC, including Zimbabwean journalist Stanley Kwenda, regularly dined at my restaurant. You were served by white people—Afrikaners to be more precise. I myself even served you and assisted my staff in washing your dishes while you were sipping drinks like a lady of leisure on my veranda.

You enjoyed exactly the same level of service that all my patrons, regardless of race, would receive. Yet, in your article titled Inside South Africa’s whites-only town of Orania published on the BBC website on 6 October 2014, you say that “the sprit of apartheid lives on” in Orania.

Hang on, come again?!

I find this statement completely absurd seeing that back in the day blacks, like Stanley and yourself, weren’t even allowed to use the same entrances, buses, benches etc. than whites, let alone getting served alcohol and food by whites in white owned restaurants. In fact, had apartheid lived on in Orania as you claim it does, you wouldn’t even have been allowed to set foot in my restaurant as a client.

You wouldn’t have been allowed to stay at the hotel you did, nor use the bathrooms you did for that matter. But according to what you wrote in your article, apartheid lives on in Orania. Bizarre.

You go on to say that you didn’t see any other black people in town. Did the Karoo sun blind you perhaps? We see and serve black and coloured people every day in Orania. They use our services and labour, exactly as you did.

Seeing that you clearly can’t be accused of being a guardian of the truth, I would like to share a simple truth with you. In the 4 years that I’ve lived in Orania I have never witnessed racial intolerance or violence, while in sharp contrast, I nearly grew accustomed to it in Gauteng—coming from both sides of the fence.

If you wanted to write an article on racism, you could’ve saved the BBC a lot of money by simply heading down to any of the hundreds of “black only” illegal shebeens littered across Joburg and asked the punters there what they think about the Afrikaners.

In your article you refer to both “Mr. Boshoff Sr.” and “Mr. Verwoerd”. Either you didn’t research these individuals or you deliberately refused to use their correct titles of Prof. and Dr. respectively.

Suffice to say that Prof. Boshoff, one of Orania’s founding fathers, was a missionary in Soweto during the heyday of apartheid and Dr. Verwoerd, the so called architect of apartheid, was the first white leader in Africa’s history to give black people fertile land of their own to govern as they deem fit, to build schools, universities and hospitals for black people and even invest millions (literally) of white tax payer money in black business and enterprise.

You say that Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) was introduced to encourage more black participation in business. It’s obvious that you’re trying to make BEE sound like a noble cause to your western audience, while in fact it is nothing more than a racist and biased scheme privileging a select few black “tenderpreneurs” and costing South Africa billions in loss in revenue since it has been introduced by the largely corrupt ANC government.

Listen, I’m an entrepreneur. I own many successful businesses that I started from scratch. I say that one doesn’t need to be empowered to participate in business, one must simply get an idea then go out and buy something for a rand and sell it for two. This in itself is encouragement enough.

No wonder why the vast majority of BEE and state run projects have failed so miserably or have become so totally corrupt and stripped of cash flow that the state, itself completely inept in running its own affairs, has to bail them out with tax payer money year after year.

Yet you criticize Dr. Verwoerd’s policies, which resulted in an average GDP growth rate of nearly 7%, while unemployment (black and white) was down to only 3%. Currently South Africa’s GDP growth rate stands at under 2% and unemployment stands at 25%. These are facts you simply cannot swindle your readers out of.

There’s no denying that you’re an intelligent woman. It just baffles me that you haven’t asked yourself how a nation can ever create sustained wealth and success if it relies on the state to constantly empower it by taking from a minority in the hope of the majority accomplishing something. The results are so poor because the racially defined socialist system by which South Africa is governed is all wrong.

The ANC has ruled South Africa for 20 years now. You state that South Africa is considered to be one of the most violent societies in the world, with one of the highest murder rates. This is factually correct. Also factually correct is that the ANC is democratically elected by your people, i.e. the black majority.

No wonder why Afrikaners like myself have become disillusioned with your country. Less than 1% of Afrikaners vote for the ANC. We’re a small minority that is entirely capable of running our own affairs, as demonstrated by the above-mentioned statistics of the Verwoerd-era and current growth in Orania. We clearly do not want, nor need your government to run our society.

It therefore comes as no surprise to me that more and more Afrikaners want out of your New South Africa and take up the call of Orania: our own land, our own labour and own rule. Don’t blame us for not wanting to dance with your nation, blame the system you so highly rate, you struggled for and obviously identify with. In the end, we’ll dance with whom we wish.

You and I discussed journalist integrity, objectivity and the media’s responsibility to uphold the truth. Your article is strewn with false information and subjective stereotyping, despite us having invited you in and making you part of our conversations. You joked and laughed with us, the whole time being fully aware of your intention to brand us according to your fallacious image of the Afrikaner.

The Afrikaner renaissance is just getting started from its core in Orania. It is based on principles of order, creativity, intellect, merit and productivity—those traditional western values that we in Orania uphold and out of which the modern free market economy and fundamental liberty was born. Had these concepts not been foreign to you, as they seem to be to so many of your fellow South Africans, you would’ve recognised them in Orania as they are in plain sight for all to see. Your article is proof that you are simply trained to think in terms of black and white—nothing more, nothing less.

Don’t expect my hospitality ever again. You being black has nothing to do with it, rather the fact that you are a sensationalist journalist that gets a kick out of spreading your misrepresented and flawed views to the world from your wee little desk at the BBC. The shame, it seems, is on you.


Quintin Diederichs

Ps. Note the correct spelling of the above.


A slightly more objective journalist’s report on Orania, this time from The Australian, can be found here.

Recommended For You


  1. Actually De Klerk and the old leadership did get something of value, which allows Orania in the first place. The right to maintain an ethnic or tribal enclave is protected by article 235 of the present constitution. This allows Orania and one other city, which name I forgot, to lawfully operate with explicit ethnic restrictions. Now, compare that to the lesser “FREEDOM” of the United States where that would be clearly illegal under the 1965 Fair Housing Act which prohibits private real estate discrimination and illegal for munincipalities under the 14th amendment of the constitution.

  2. I have come to the conclusion that in Britain from the queen, the government and BBC a Boer/Afrikaner cannot expect any sympathy or respect. There seems to be some sort of discriminatory hate towards us. The same cannot be said of the Brits themselves, they do in general do not discriminate as much as aforementioned.

    1. We normal white English people are on your side, when all those peoople were singing Freee nelson mandeela, in the 80’s I was so disgusted I had a T shirt with Hang Nelson Mandela printed, and wore it with pride, many of us are with you.

  3. I’m afraid the BBC has lost its reputation as an impartial and comprehensive media organisation. It has long been an organisation full of Guardian reading left wing people.

    Their presenters always load their questions with adjectives that are unfounded in order to subliminally influence their listeners; e.g. ‘the extreme right wing anti-migration protestors were opposed by a counter demonstration by anti-fascists.’ They were describing a protest by people who know very well the consequences of mass immigration and wanted to peacefully demonstrate, and a group of left-wing agitators who want to stifle understandable reactions and label people as something they are not.

    1. I recently complained to the BBC about Laura Kuenssberg the BBC’s “Political Editor” who stage managed a so-called documentary on BBC2 to so-say examine both sides of the argument for ‘Leave’ or ‘Remain’ the EU. In fact the programme contained a complete re-run of all the salient points made by the IMF, World Bank, Bank of England and all the rest of the shysters in support of ‘Remain’ with a sparse sprinkling of supporters for ‘Leave’ as a fig leaf to somehow create the illusion of, ‘balance’. There was nothing objective about the programme and I commented to the BBC that all Kuenssberg was lacking was a large ‘Vote Remain’ badge prominently pinned to her clothing. My trust in BBC reporting was lost some years ago and I would certainly not agree with the BBC when they declare that it, (the BBC), ‘is the most trusted broadcaster worldwide’.

  4. BBC = bulls**t broadcast corporation, “elite” sponsored and financed (getting millions form EU) that is working against anyone who see things for what they really are.
    They do however have power of premonition, on 9/11/2001 they were able to tell us that building 7 (third building “collapsing” in its own footprint in New York) collapsed, twenty minutes BEFORE it happened.
    I pity the poor fools who still pay their license fee.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.