U.S. President Donald Trump has been dramatically revealed as just another lying neo-con warmonger after ordering missile attacks upon the anti-ISIS Syrian army—in direct contradiction to his claim that he would use American military might to “crush ISIS.”
In attacking the Syrian army—which, along with the Russian air force, Lebanon’s Hezbollah, and volunteers from Iran, are the only ground forces fighting ISIS in Syria—Trump has fallen into line with his “unshakeable ally” Israel, which also regularly bombs Syrian army installations to weaken the anti-ISIS coalition.
Trump’s decision to attack the anti-ISIS forces in Syria was based on “intelligence” provided, of course, by Israel.
According to a report in the U.K.’s Independent newspaper, “leaked Israeli intelligence information” from Mossad was the first to claim that the chemical attack had been carried out by the Syrian government.
This “intelligence” provided the basis for all other controlled media coverage and was fed to the White House as well.
This “intelligence” was—as is now the established norm for information emanating from the Jewish ethnostate—an outright lie.
As Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem pointedout, the first reports of the chemical attack in the province of Idlib appeared online five hours before the Syrian Air Forces conducted an airstrike on an al-Nusra Front ammunition depot on April 4.
“The chemical attack in Khan Shaykhun was reported at 06:00 am, while the first airstrike by the Syrian army on an ammunition depot of al-Nusra terrorists with chemical weapons inside it was carried out at 11:00 am,” Muallem said.
In other words, the alleged “chemical attack” was not an attack at all, and most likely a spill caused by either an accident or leak at a chemical weapons storage facility managed by the ISIS-affiliated terrorists.
This was in fact what a Russian government spokesman—clearly not relying on Israeli “intelligence”—announced almost immediately as the cause of the incident.
Trump’s actions in attacking Syria are a surprise only to those who actually thought he was “independent,” and not fully under the control of the Jewish lobby in America, despite his earlier “opposition” to attacking Syria.
The reversion to warmongering on behalf of Israel reveals clearly that there is no difference at all between Trump and any of his predecessors with regard to foreign policy and subservience to Israel.
The Foundation for Economic Education (FEE)—one of the U.S.’s oldest free market think tanks—noted in an article that this is the third time that terrorist groups in Syria have carried out chemical attacks which have then been blamed on the Syrian government.
The FEE article, titled “Some Questions aboutthe Chemical Attack in Syria,” pointed out that there were two attacks in 2013, “both of which the Obama administration used to try to justify a direct strike on the Assad government.”
The United Nations “thoroughly investigated the first 2013 attack” and concluded that it had been “carried out by the Syrian rebels — not the Syrian government.”
The second attack, investigated by Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh, revealed that the “U.S. quite deliberately attempted to frame the evidence to justify a strike on Assad without even considering al-Nusra, a terror group with access to nerve agents that should have been a prime suspect.”
“Yet without directly confirming any of the intelligence, the media and politicians are out in full force condemning the Assad government,” the FEE article added.
As former U.S. Congressman Ron Paul pointedout in his Liberty Report of April 5,2017:
Does anyone believe that on the eve of peace talks, just after the White House said the Syrian people should choose their own leaders, that Assad would launch a gas attack to turn the whole world against him? We don’t either.We’re back to the same lies that got us into Iraq. Do we never learn to question the propaganda?”